CompTIA PT0-002 CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam Exam Practice Test

Scraping social media for personal details can help a penetration tester craft personalized and convincing social engineering attacks against top-level executives, who may share sensitive or confidential information on their profiles. Registering domain names that are similar to the target company’s can be used for phishing or typosquatting attacks, but not specifically against executives. Identifying technical contacts at the company can help with reconnaissance, but not with social engineering. Crawling the company’s website for company information can provide general background knowledge, but not specific details about executives.

Situational awareness is the ability to perceive and understand the environment and events around oneself, and to act accordingly. The penetration tester demonstrated situational awareness by stopping the transfer of PII, which was out of scope and could have violated the ROE or legal and ethical principles. The other options are not relevant to the situation or the decision of the penetration tester.

The best method available to pivot and gain additional access to the network is to span deauthentication packets to the wireless clients. This will cause them to disconnect from their wireless access point and reconnect using their hard-wired connection, which may have less restrictive ACLs. The penetration tester can then capture their traffic or attempt to compromise their systems.

The script author was trying to spawn a local shell by using the os.system() function, which executes a command in a subshell. The command being executed is “/bin/bash”, which is the path to the bash shell, a common shell program on Linux systems. The script author may have wanted to spawn a local shell to gain more control or access over the compromised system, or to execute other commands that are not possible in the original shell. The other options are not plausible explanations for what the script author was trying to do.

The penetration tester recommended the code be updated to use a random salt instead of a fixed salt for hashing passwords. A salt is a random value that is added to the plaintext password before hashing it, to prevent attacks such as rainbow tables or dictionary attacks that rely on precomputed hashes of common or weak passwords. A random salt ensures that each password hash is unique and unpredictable, even if two users have the same password. However, changing the salt does not affect the existing hashes that were created with the old salt, which may still be vulnerable to attacks. Therefore, the penetration tester should recommend changing passwords that were created before this code update, so that they can be hashed with the new salt and be more secure. The other options are not valid steps that the penetration tester should recommend. Keeping hashes created by both methods for compatibility would defeat the purpose of updating the code, as it would leave some hashes vulnerable to attacks. Rehashing all old passwords with the new code would not work, as it would require knowing the plaintext passwords, which are not stored in the database. Replacing the SHA-256 algorithm to something more secure is not necessary, as SHA-256 is a secure and widely used hashing algorithm that has no known vulnerabilities or collisions.

https://hackertarget.com/nikto-website-scanner/

The file .scripts/daily_log_backup.sh has permissions set to 777, meaning that anyone can read, write, or execute the file. Since it's owned by the root user and the penetration tester has access to the system with a non-privileged account, this could be a potential avenue for privilege escalation. In a penetration test, after finding such a file, the tester would likely want to explore it and see if it can be leveraged to gain higher privileges. This is often done by inserting malicious code or commands into the script if it's being executed with higher privileges, such as root in this case.

The document that describes activities that are prohibited during a scheduled penetration test is ROE, which stands for rules of engagement. ROE is a document that defines the scope, objectives, methods, limitations, and expectations of a penetration test. ROE can specify what activities are allowed or prohibited during the penetration test, such as which targets, systems, networks, or services can be tested or attacked, which tools, techniques, or exploits can be used or avoided, which times or dates can be scheduled or excluded, or which impacts or risks can be accepted or mitigated. ROE can help ensure that the penetration test is conducted in a legal, ethical, and professional manner, and that it does not cause any harm or damage to the client or third parties. The other options are not documents that describe activities that are prohibited during a scheduled penetration test. MSA stands for master service agreement, which is a document that defines the general terms and conditions of a contractual relationship between two parties, such as the scope of work, payment terms, warranties, liabilities, or dispute resolution. NDA stands for non-disclosure agreement, which is a document that defines the confidential information that is shared between two parties during a business relationship, such as trade secrets, intellectual property, or customer data. SLA stands for service level agreement, which is a document that defines the quality and performance standards of a service provided by one party to another party, such as availability, reliability, responsiveness, or security.

The Nmap command that the tester should use to scan for ports without establishing a connection and to find version data information for services running on open ports is nmap -sS -sV -F target.company.com. This command has the following options:

-sS performs a TCP SYN scan, which is a scan technique that sends TCP packets with the SYN flag set to the target ports and analyzes the responses. A TCP SYN scan does not establish a full TCP connection, as it only completes the first step of the three-way handshake. A TCP SYN scan can stealthily scan for open ports without alerting the target system or application.

-sV performs version detection, which is a feature that probes open ports to determine the service and version information of the applications running on them. Version detection can provide useful information for identifying vulnerabilities or exploits that affect specific versions of services or applications.

-F performs a fast scan, which is a scan option that only scans the 100 most common ports according to the nmap-services file. A fast scan can speed up the scan process by avoiding scanning less likely or less interesting ports.

target.company.com specifies the domain name of the target system or network to be scanned.

The other options are not valid Nmap commands that meet the requirements of the question. Option A performs a UDP scan (-sU), which is a scan technique that sends UDP packets to the target ports and analyzes the responses. A UDP scan can scan for open ports that use UDP protocol, such as DNS, SNMP, or DHCP. However, a UDP scan does establish a connection with the target system or application, unlike a TCP SYN scan. Option C performs a TCP connect scan (-sT), which is a scan technique that sends TCP packets with the SYN flag set to the target ports and completes the three-way handshake with an ACK packet if a SYN/ACK packet is received. A TCP connect scan can scan for open ports that use TCP protocol, such as HTTP, FTP, or SSH. However, a TCP connect scan does establish a full TCP connection with the target system or application, unlike a TCP SYN scan. Option D performs an Xmas scan (-sX), which is a scan technique that sends TCP packets with the FIN, PSH, and URG flags set to the target ports and analyzes the responses. An Xmas scan can stealthily scan for open ports without alerting the target system or application, similar to a TCP SYN scan. However, option D does not perform version detection (-sV), which is one of the requirements of the question.

Based on these results, the most likely attack to succeed is a Heartbleed attack. The Heartbleed attack is a vulnerability in the OpenSSL implementation of the TLS/SSL protocol that allows an attacker to read the memory of the server and potentially steal sensitive information, such as private keys, passwords, or session tokens. The results show that the website is using OpenSSL 1.0.1f, which is vulnerable to the Heartbleed attack1.

 The most likely next step for the penetration tester is to scan the equipment and verify the findings, which is a process of using tools or techniques to probe or test the target equipment for vulnerabilities or weaknesses that can be exploited. Scanning and verifying the findings can help the penetration tester confirm that the models of equipment purchased are vulnerable to attack, and identify the specific vulnerabilities or exploits that affect them. Scanning and verifying the findings can also help the penetration tester prepare for the next steps of the assessment, such as exploiting or reporting the vulnerabilities. Scanning and verifying the findings can be done by using tools such as Nmap, which can scan hosts and networks for ports, services, versions, OS, or other information1, or Metasploit, which can exploit hosts and networks using various payloads or modules2. The other options are not likely next steps for the penetration tester. Alerting the target company of the discovered information is not a next step, but rather a final step, that involves reporting the findings and recommendations to the client after completing the assessment. Verifying the discovered information with the manufacturer is not a next step, as it may not provide accurate or reliable information about the vulnerabilities or exploits that affect the equipment, and it may also alert the manufacturer or the client of the assessment. Returning to the dumpster for more information is not a next step, as it may not yield any more useful or relevant information than what was already collected from the receipts.

Port randomization is widely used in port scanners. By default, Nmap randomizes the scanned port order (except that certain commonly accessible ports are moved near the beginning for efficiency reasons) https://nmap.org/book/man-port-specification.html

The best recommendation to remediate this vulnerability is to use parameterized queries in the web application. Parameterized queries are a way of preventing SQL injection attacks by separating the SQL statements from the user input. This way, the user input is treated as a literal value and not as part of the SQL statement. For example, instead of using x’ OR role LIKE '%admin%, the user input would be passed as a parameter to a prepared statement that would check if it matches any value in the database.

The first step that a tester should perform to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack is to scan the containers for open ports. Open ports are entry points for network communication and can expose services or applications that may be vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Scanning the containers for open ports can help the tester identify which services or applications are running on the containers, and which ones may need to be secured or disabled to prevent DDoS attacks. Scanning the containers for open ports can also help the tester discover any unauthorized or malicious services or applications that may have been installed on the containers by previous attackers or compromised containers. Scanning the containers for open ports can be done by using tools such as Nmap, which can perform network scanning and enumeration by sending packets to hosts and analyzing their responses1. The other options are not the first steps that a tester should perform to determine if the new containers are configured correctly against a DDoS attack. Testing the strength of the encryption settings is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as encryption does not prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks, but rather protects data confidentiality and integrity. Determining if security tokens are easily available is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as security tokens are used for authentication and authorization, not for preventing or mitigating DDoS attacks. Performing a vulnerability check against the hypervisor is not relevant to DDoS attacks, as the hypervisor is not directly exposed to network traffic, but rather manages the virtual machines or containers that run on it.

A DNS poisoning attack is an attack that exploits a vulnerability in the DNS protocol or system to redirect traffic from legitimate websites to malicious ones. A DNS poisoning attack works by injecting false DNS records into a DNS server or resolver’s cache, which is a temporary storage of DNS information. However, if the DNS cache was not refreshed, then the attack would fail, as the target machine would still use the old and valid DNS records from its cache. The other options are not likely causes of the attack failure.

The /var/log/lastlog file is a log file that stores information about the last user to sign in to the server. This file stores information such as the username, IP address, and timestamp of the last user to sign in to the server. It can be used by a penetration tester to determine the identity of the last user who signed in to the web server, which can be helpful in identifying the user who may have set up the backdoors and other malicious activities.

The comment in the final report was intended for C-suite executives, which are senior-level managers or leaders in an organization, such as the chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO), or chief information officer (CIO). C-suite executives are typically interested in high-level summaries or overviews of the penetration test results, such as the percentage of systems affected by a certain vulnerability or risk, the potential impact or cost of a breach, or the recommended actions or priorities for remediation. C-suite executives may not have the technical background or expertise to understand detailed or technical information about the penetration test, such as specific vulnerabilities, exploits, tools, or techniques. The comment in the final report provides a high-level summary of the penetration test result that is relevant and understandable for C-suite executives. The other audiences are not likely to be interested in this comment. Systems administrators are technical staff who are responsible for installing, configuring, maintaining, and securing systems and networks. They would be more interested in detailed or technical information about the penetration test, such as specific vulnerabilities, exploits, tools, or techniques. Data privacy ombudsman is a person who acts as an independent mediator between individuals and organizations regarding data privacy issues or complaints. They would be more interested in information about how the penetration test complied with data privacy laws and regulations, such as GDPR or CCPA. Regulatory officials are authorities who enforce compliance with laws and regulations related to a specific industry or sector, such as finance, health care, or energy. They would be more interested in information about how the penetration test complied with industry-specific standards and frameworks, such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, or NERC-CIP.

The best tool for performing an on-path attack on BLE smart devices is Gattacker. Gattacker is a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) pentesting and fuzzing framework specifically designed for on-path attacks. It allows security analysts to perform a variety of tasks, including man-in-the-middle attacks, passive and active scans, fuzzing of BLE services, and more. Gattacker also provides an interactive command-line interface that makes it easy to interact with the target BLE device and execute various commands.

The BEST passive method of obtaining the technical contacts for the website would be a WHOIS domain lookup. WHOIS is a protocol that provides information about registered domain names, such as the registration date, registrant's name and contact information, and the name servers assigned to the domain. By performing a WHOIS lookup, the penetration tester can obtain the contact information of the website's technical staff, which can be used to craft a convincing phishing email.

The image shows the output of the netstat -antu command, which displays active internet connections for the TCP and UDP protocols. The output shows that there are four established TCP connections and two listening UDP connections on the host. The established TCP connections have high numbered ports as their local addresses, such as 49152, 49153, 49154, and 49155. These ports are in the range of ephemeral ports, which are dynamically assigned by the operating system for temporary use by applications or processes. The foreign addresses of these connections are also high numbered ports, such as 4433, 4434, 4435, and 4436. These ports are not well-known or registered ports for any common service or protocol. The combination of high numbered ports for both local and foreign addresses suggests that these connections are suspicious and may indicate a backdoor or a covert channel on the host. Therefore, the penetration tester should investigate these connections next to determine their nature and purpose. The other options are not appropriate actions for the penetration tester at this stage.

The most effective way for the tester to achieve this objective is to send a pretext email from the IT department before sending the download instructions later. A pretext email is an email that uses deception or impersonation to trick users into believing that it is from a legitimate source or authority, such as the IT department. A pretext email can be used to establish trust or rapport with the users, and then persuade them to perform an action or provide information that benefits the attacker. In this case, the tester can send a pretext email from the IT department that informs users about an important update or maintenance task that requires them to download and run an executable file later. The tester can then send another email with the download instructions and attach or link to the malicious executable file. The users may be more likely to follow these instructions if they have received a prior email from the IT department that prepared them for this action. The other options are not as effective ways for the tester to achieve this objective. Dropping USB flash drives around the company campus with the file on it may not reach many users, as they may not find or pick up the USB flash drives, or they may be suspicious of their origin or content.

The sys module is a built-in module in Python that provides access to system-specific parameters and functions, such as command-line arguments, standard input/output, and exit status. The sys module must be imported before it can be used in a script, otherwise an error will occur. The script uses the sys.argv variable, which is a list that contains the command-line arguments passed to the script. However, the script does not import the sys module at the beginning, which causes the error “NameError: name ‘sys’ is not defined”. To fix this error, the script should include the statement “import sys” at the top. The other options are not valid reasons for the error.

The company that requested the penetration test is responsible for providing the correct and accurate network scope for the test. The network scope defines the boundaries and limitations of the test, such as which IP addresses, domains, systems, or networks are in scope or out of scope. If the company provided an incorrect network scope that included an IP address that belongs to a third party, then it is responsible for this mistake. The penetration testing company, the target host’s owner, the penetration tester, and the subcontractor supporting the test are not responsible for this mistake, as they relied on the network scope provided by the company that requested the penetration test.

Access keys are credentials that allow users to authenticate and authorize requests to a source code management (SCM) system, such as GitLab or AWS. Access keys should be kept secret and not exposed in plain text within the source code, as this can compromise the security and integrity of the SCM system and its data.

Some possible options for addressing the issue of access keys within an organization’s SCM solution are:

Setting up a secret management solution for all items in the SCM system: This is a tool or service that securely stores, manages, and distributes secrets such as access keys, passwords, tokens, certificates, etc. A secret management solution can help prevent secrets from being exposed in plain text within the source code or configuration files3456.

Developing a secure software development life cycle (SDLC) process for committing code to the SCM system: This is a framework or methodology that defines how software is developed, tested, deployed, and maintained. A secure SDLC process can help ensure that best practices for security are followed throughout the software development process, such as code reviews, static analysis tools, vulnerability scanning tools, etc. A secure SDLC process can help detect and prevent access keys from being included in the source code before they are committed to the SCM system1.

A web shell is a malicious script that allows remote access and control of a web server. A penetration tester may use a web shell to execute commands on the target server during a penetration test. However, after the test is completed, the penetration tester should remove the web shell to avoid leaving any traces or backdoors on the server. The command rm -f /var/www/html/G679h32gYu.php deletes the file G679h32gYu.php from the web server’s document root directory, which is likely the location of the web shell. The other options are not plausible explanations for why the penetration tester wants this command executed.

 If a penetration tester was able to access the organization’s wireless network from outside of the building using Aircrack-ng, then it means that the wireless network was not secured with strong encryption or authentication methods. Aircrack-ng is a tool that can crack weak wireless encryption schemes such as WEP or WPA-PSK using various techniques such as packet capture, injection, replay, and brute force. To remediate this issue, the client should change to Wi-Fi equipment that supports strong encryption such as WPA2 or WPA3, which are more resistant to cracking attacks. Using directional antennae may reduce the signal range of the wireless network, but it would not prevent an attacker who is within range from cracking the encryption. Using WEP encryption is not a good recommendation, as WEP is known to be insecure and vulnerable to Aircrack-ng attacks. Disabling Wi-Fi may eliminate the risk of wireless attacks, but it would also eliminate the benefits of wireless connectivity for the organization.

OLLYDBG, WinDBG, and IDA are all debugging tools that support Windows environments. GDB is a Linux‐specific debugging tool.

GDB is a tool that can be used to analyze and debug executable binaries, especially on Linux systems. GDB can disassemble, decompile, set breakpoints, examine memory, modify registers, and perform other operations on binaries. GDB can help a penetration tester understand the functionality, behavior, and vulnerabilities of an unknown binary. Peach is a tool that can be used to perform fuzzing, which is a technique of sending malformed or random data to a target to trigger errors or crashes. WinDbg and OllyDbg are tools that can be used to analyze and debug executable binaries, but they are mainly designed for Windows systems.

The site: command can be used to restrict searches on Google to a specific domain. For example, site:company.com will return only results from the company.com domain. This can help the penetration tester to find information or pages related to the target domain.

The scoping document is a document that defines the objectives, scope, limitations, deliverables, and expectations of a penetration testing engagement. It is an essential document that guides the penetration testing process and ensures that both the tester and the client agree on the terms and conditions of the test. Requiring all testers to review the scoping document carefully would have most effectively prevented this misunderstanding, as it would have informed the new tester about the client’s request not to test the production networks. The other options are not effective or realistic ways to prevent this misunderstanding.

Network segmentation is the practice of dividing a network into smaller subnetworks or segments based on different criteria, such as function, security level, or access control. Network segmentation can enhance the security of a network by isolating sensitive or critical systems from less secure or untrusted systems, reducing the attack surface, limiting the spread of malware or intrusions, and enforcing granular policies and rules for each segment. To be PCI compliant, which is a set of standards for protecting payment card data, the company should have implemented network segmentation to separate the servers that perform financial transactions from other parts of the network that may be less secure or more exposed to threats. The other options are not specific requirements for PCI compliance, although they may be good security practices in general.

The most likely explanation for why a penetration tester cannot scan a server that was previously scanned successfully is that the IP address is on the blocklist. Blocklists are used to prevent malicious actors from scanning servers, and if the IP address of the server is on the blocklist, the scanning process will be blocked.

The nmap –f --badsum 192.168.1.10 command is most likely to avoid detection by the client’s IDS, as it will use two techniques to evade IDS signatures or filters. The –f option will fragment the IP packets into smaller pieces that might bypass some IDS rules or firewalls. The --badsum option will use an invalid checksum in the TCP or UDP header that might cause some IDS systems to ignore the packets.

Both Hydra and Medusa can be used for that same purpose:

THC Hydra is a brute-force cracking tool for remote authentication services. It supports many protocols, including telnet, FTP, LDAP, SSH, SNMP, and others.

Medusa is a Parallel, Modular and Speedy method for brute-force which issued for remote

authentication. Following are the applications and protocols like modular design, Thread based parallel testing and flexible user input and protocols are AFP, CVS, FTP, HTTP, IMAP etc.

According to the Official CompTIA PenTest+ Self-Paced Study Guide1, the correct answer is A. nmap -sn -n -exclude 10.1.1.15 10.1.1.0/24 -oA target_txt.

This command will perform a ping scan (-sn) without reverse DNS resolution (-n) on the IP range 10.1.1.0/24, excluding the attack machine’s IP address (10.1.1.15) from the scan (-exclude). It will also output the results in three formats (normal, grepable and XML) with a base name of target_txt (-oA).

"A significant issue identified by Wiberg is that using active network scanners, such as Nmap, presents a weakness when attempting port recognition or service detection on SCADA devices. Wiberg states that active tools such as Nmap can use unusual TCP segment data to try and find available ports. Furthermore, they can open a massive amount of connections with a specific SCADA device but then fail to close them gracefully." And since SCADA and ICS devices are designed and implemented with little attention having been paid to the operational security of these devices and their ability to handle errors or unexpected events, the presence idle open connections may result into errors that cannot be handled by the devices.

https://steemit.com/informatica/@jordiurbina1/tutorial-hacking-wi-fi-wireless-networks-with-wifislax

The penetration tester should send deauthentication frames to the stations to force them to disconnect from their current access point and reconnect to another one, which may be the malicious AP deployed by the tester. Deauthentication frames are part of the 802.11 protocol and are used to terminate an existing wireless association between a station and an access point. However, they can also be spoofed by an attacker to disrupt or hijack wireless connections. The other options are not effective or relevant for this purpose. Performing jamming on all 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels would interfere with all wireless signals in the area, which may cause unwanted attention or legal issues. Setting the malicious AP to broadcast within dynamic frequency selection channels would not help, as these channels are used to avoid interference with radar systems and are not commonly used by wireless stations or access points. Modifying the malicious AP configuration to not use a pre-shared key would not help, as it would make it less likely for wireless stations to connect to it if they are configured to use encryption.

The VRFY and EXPN commands can be used to enumerate user accounts on an SMTP server, as they are used to verify the existence of users or mailing lists. VRFY (verify) asks the server to confirm that a given user name or address is valid. EXPN (expand) asks the server to expand a mailing list into its individual members. These commands can be used by a penetration tester to identify valid user names or e-mail addresses on the target SMTP server.

https://www.netscout.com/what-is-ddos/slowloris-attacks

From the http-title in the output, this looks like an IoT device with RH implying Relative Humidity, that offers a web-based interface for visualizing the results.

If the employee already works in the accounting department, MFA will not stop their actions because they'll already have access by virtue of their job.

Enforcing mandatory employee vacations is the best recommendation to prevent this type of activity in the future, as it will make it harder for an employee to conceal fraudulent transactions or unauthorized changes to a payment system. Mandatory employee vacations are a form of internal control that requires employees to take time off from work periodically and have their duties performed by someone else. This can help detect errors, irregularities, or frauds committed by employees who might otherwise have exclusive access or control over certain processes or systems.

Technical and billing addresses are usually posted on company websites and company social media sites for the their clients to access. The WHOIS lookup will only avail info for the company registrant, an abuse email contact, etc but it may not contain details for billing addresses.

Clarifying the statement of work is one of the most important items to develop fully prior to beginning the penetration testing activities, as it defines the scope, objectives, deliverables, and expectations of the engagement. The statement of work is a formal document that outlines the agreement between the penetration tester and the client and serves as a reference for both parties throughout the engagement. It should include details such as the type, duration, and frequency of testing, the target systems and networks, the authorized methods and tools, the reporting format and schedule, and any legal or ethical considerations.

the NMAP flag (-sn) which is for host discovery and returns that kind of NMAP output. And the AWK command selects column 5 ({print $5}) which obviously carries the returned IP of the host in the NMAP output.

This command will generate the results shown in the image and transform them into a list of active hosts for further analysis. The command consists of three parts:

nmap -sn 192.168.0.1-254: This part uses nmap, a network scanning tool, to perform a ping scan (-sn) on the IP range 192.168.0.1-254, which means sending ICMP echo requests to each IP address and checking if they respond.

grep “Nmap scan”: This part uses grep, a text filtering tool, to search for the string “Nmap scan” in the output of the previous part and display only the matching lines. This will filter out the lines that show the start and end time of the scan and only show the lines that indicate the status of each host.

awk ‘{print $5}’: This part uses awk, a text processing tool, to print the fifth field ($5) of each line in the output of the previous part. This will extract only the IP addresses of each host and display them as a list.

The final output will look something like this:

192.168.0.1 192.168.0.12 192.168.0.17 192.168.0.34

PLCs are programmable logic controllers that execute logic operations on input signals from sensors and output signals to actuators. They are often connected to supervisory systems that provide human-machine interfaces and data acquisition functions. If both systems are connected to the company intranet, they are exposed to potential attacks from internal or external adversaries. A valid assumption is that controllers will not validate the origin of commands, meaning that an attacker can send malicious commands to manipulate or sabotage the industrial process. The other assumptions are not valid because they contradict the facts or common practices.

the 2>/dev/null is output redirection, it simply sends all the error messages to infinity and beyond preventing any error messages to appear in the terminal session.

The tester is trying to find files with the SUID bit set on the system. The SUID (set user ID) bit is a special permission that allows a file to be executed with the privileges of the file owner, regardless of who runs it. This can be used to perform privileged operations or access restricted resources. A penetration tester can use the find command with the -user and -perm options to search for files owned by a specific user (such as root) and having a specific permission (such as 4000, which indicates the SUID bit is set).

URL enumeration is the activity of discovering and mapping the URLs of a website, such as directories, files, parameters, or subdomains. URL enumeration can help to identify the structure, content, and functionality of a website, as well as potential vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. One of the methods of URL enumeration is to analyze the robots.txt file of a website, which is a text file that tells search engine crawlers which URLs the crawler can or can’t request from the site1. The output shown in the question is an example of a robots.txt file that disallows crawling of certain URLs, such as /author/, /xmlrpc.php, /wp-admin, or /page/.

A. The libraries may be vulnerable to security bugs or exploits that can compromise the application or the data. According to the web search results, open-source libraries often have vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers, such as Heartbleed, Shellshock, DROWN, or npm left-pad1234. These vulnerabilities can allow attackers to extract sensitive data, execute arbitrary commands, decrypt encrypted traffic, or break the functionality of the application. Therefore, using third-party open-source libraries in application code poses a significant security risk.

D. The provenance of code is unknown, meaning that the origin and history of the code are not verified or documented. According to the web search results, open-source libraries and client projects are developed and continuously evolving in an asynchronous way, which makes it difficult to track the changes and updates of the code2. Moreover, open-source libraries may have dependencies on other libraries, which can introduce additional risks or vulnerabilities1. Therefore, using third-party open-source libraries in application code poses a significant quality risk.

All other answers are a form of encryption or randomizing the data.

This will then enable the PenTest to continue so that additional issues can be found, exploited, and analyzed.

A01-Injection

A02-Broken Authentication

A03-Sensitive Data Exposure

A04-XXE

A05-Broken Access Control

A06-Security Misconfiguration

A07-XSS

A08-Insecure Deserialization

A09-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

A10-Insufficient Logging & Monitoring

In the scenario where users are mistyping the name of a fileshare server, leading to broadcast requests, the most effective exploitation strategy would be for the penetration tester to respond to these requests with their own IP address (D) and set up a service to capture authentication credentials. This technique is known as a "Man-in-the-Middle" (MitM) attack, where the attacker intercepts communication between two parties. In this case, the tester can exploit the misdirected requests to potentially capture sensitive information such as usernames and passwords.

The -sX flag in Nmap performs a Xmas scan, which sends packets with the FIN, PSH, and URG flags set. This is an attempt to bypass firewalls and IDS/IPS devices by using a non-standard TCP packet. However, if the target port is closed, it will respond with a RST (reset) packet, indicating that there is no connection to be closed. This is how the penetration tester can infer that the ports in the target range are closed. If the port is open, the target will ignore the packet and not send any response. References:

•Nmap Cheat Sheet 2024: All the Commands & Flags - StationX

•Nmap Commands - 17 Basic Commands for Linux Network - phoenixNAP

•NMAP Flag Guide: What They Are, When to Use Them - CBT Nuggets

•[The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Self-Paced Study Guide (Exam PT0-002)], Chapter 4: Conducting Active Scanning, page 151.

When calculating the price of a penetration test service for a client, the most important aspect to consider is the required scope of work 1. The scope of work defines the objectives of the penetration test and the systems that will be tested. It is important to understand the scope of work to determine the resources required to complete the test and the time it will take to complete the test 2.

References: 2: CompTIA. (2021). CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam Objectives. Retrieved from https://www.comptia.org/content/dam/comptia/documents/certifications/Exam%20Objectives/CompTIA-PenTest%2B%20Exam%20Objectives%20PT0-002.pdf  1: O’Brien, D. (2021). The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002). John Wiley & Sons.

To understand and exploit the vulnerability causing the server application to crash or remain stable after opening several simultaneous connections, the best approach is to attach a remote debugger to the application. This allows the penetration tester to monitor the application’s behavior in real-time without affecting the stability of the testing environment. Establishing a large number of connections to the server and sending fixed packets of data simultaneously can help to reproduce the issue consistently, which is crucial for identifying the cause of the crashes. Analyzing the application's response and debugging data will provide insights into potential buffer overflow, race conditions, or other vulnerabilities.

References:

Effective Debugging Techniques

Fuzz Testing and Debugging

Requiring local network access for the default Admin User account is a targeted measure to prevent unauthorized access from unfamiliar IP addresses, particularly those originating from outside the organization's network. This approach ensures that only devices physically connected to or authenticated within the local network can attempt to use the Admin User account, significantly reducing the risk of external attacks. Increasing password complexity and restricting simultaneous log-ins are good practices but do not directly address the issue of access from unfamiliar IPs. System hardening is broader and not specifically focused on the Admin User account issue.

The PHP file uploaded by the penetration tester allows for Remote Code Execution (RCE) by executing the command supplied through the cmd POST parameter. To exploit this, the penetration tester needs to send a POST request to the PHP file with the command they want to execute.

Among the given options, Option A is the most suitable for achieving RCE:

It uses Python's requests library to send a POST request, which is appropriate because the PHP script expects data through the POST method.

The data parameter in the requests.post function is correctly formatted as a dictionary, which is the expected format for sending form data in POST requests. It includes the key cmd with the value id, which is a common command used to display the current user ID and group ID.

The only minor issue with Option A is that it prints the entire response object, which includes not just the response content but also metadata like status code and headers. To print just the response content (which would include the output of the id command), appending .text to the requests.post call would be more precise, but this is a small detail and does not affect the execution of the command.

The other options have various issues:

Option B is close but has a syntax error in the data argument. It uses parentheses () instead of curly braces {} for the dictionary, and also lacks the .text at the end to print the response content.

Options C and D use the requests.get method, which is not suitable in this scenario because the PHP script is expecting data through the POST method, not the GET method. Additionally, Option D has a syntax error similar to Option B.

When additional data is returned in the API response that is not displayed in the web user interface, it indicates that there might be sensitive data being transmitted that is not intended for user display. By comparing the fields returned in the API response to those that are visible in the GUI, a penetration tester can identify any Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or other sensitive data that might be exposed unintentionally. This method is direct and does not involve attacking the system but rather analyzing the data being transmitted. The other options do not directly address the identification of sensitive data in API responses.

When a penetration tester notices several target hosts appearing to be residential connections associated with a major television and ISP, it's likely that the IP ranges initially assigned to the target organization have changed ownership and are now allocated to the ISP for residential use. This can happen due to reallocation of IP addresses by regional internet registries. Misconfiguration of the scanner (option A), malfunctioning of scanning tools (option B), or firewall blocking (option D) would not typically result in the discovery of residential connections in place of expected organizational targets.

The Nmap scan command given will scan all the hosts in the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet, except for the one with the IP address 192.168.0.101. The subnet has 256 possible hosts, but one of them is excluded, so the total number of servers that Nmap will attempt to scan is 255. References:

Nmap Commands - 17 Basic Commands for Linux Network, Section: Scan Multiple Hosts, Subsection: Excluding Hosts from Search

Nmap Cheat Sheet 2023: All the Commands and More, Section: Target Specification, Subsection: -exclude

The cme smb 192.168.0.0/24 -u /userList.txt -p /passwordList.txt command is used to perform SMB enumeration on the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet using a list of usernames and passwords. The -u option specifies the file containing the usernames, and the -p option specifies the file containing the passwords1. This command allows the tester to attempt to authenticate with multiple accounts without locking any of them out. References: SMB Command

The risk present in an organization using Android mobile devices without Mobile Device Management (MDM) services is that unsigned applications can be installed. Without MDM, there are fewer controls over the installation of applications, which increases the risk of installing malicious or unauthorized applications. MDM services typically provide a way to enforce application signing policies, preventing the installation of unsigned apps.

References:

OWASP Mobile Security Project

NIST Mobile Device Management Guide

The attacker creates an access point with the same name and network settings as a legitimate access point, but with a stronger signal to attract users. Once a victim connects to the rogue access point, the attacker can intercept and steal any data transmitted over the connection, including login credentials, credit card information, and other sensitive data.

Impersonation attacks involve the penetration tester assuming the identity of a valid user to gain unauthorized access to systems or information. This method is particularly effective for gathering valid user credentials, as it can involve tactics such as phishing, social engineering, or exploiting weak authentication processes. The other options, such as Wardriving, Captive portal, and Deauthentication, are more focused on wireless network vulnerabilities and are less direct in obtaining user credentials.

Hydra is a powerful tool for conducting brute-force attacks against various protocols, including SSH. It is capable of using multiple threads to perform concurrent attempts, significantly increasing the efficiency of the attack. This capability makes Hydra particularly suited for brute-forcing user passwords over SSH, as it can quickly try numerous combinations of usernames and passwords. The tool's ability to support a wide range of protocols, its flexibility in handling different authentication mechanisms, and its efficiency in managing multiple simultaneous connections make it a go-to choice for penetration testers looking to test the strength of passwords in a target system's SSH service.

The assessment scope and methodologies document defines the objectives, boundaries, rules of engagement, and expected outcomes of a penetration testing engagement. It also specifies the roles and responsibilities of the testers and the clients, as well as the communication channels and escalation procedures. This document can help determine who is at fault for a temporary outage that occurred during a penetration test, as it can clarify whether the outage was within the agreed scope and methodologies, or whether it was caused by a violation of the rules of engagement or a lack of coordination. References:

•CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 1.0 Planning and Scoping, Objective 1.1: Given a scenario, explain the importance of scoping an engagement properly.

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Instructor and Student Guides (PT0-002), Lesson 1: Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests, Topic 1.1: Introduction to Penetration Testing Concepts, Topic 1.2: The Penetration Testing Process, Topic 1.3: Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests.

A BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) attack is specifically designed to exploit vulnerabilities in the Bluetooth Low Energy protocol, which is commonly used in modern wireless devices, including key fobs for electric vehicles. This type of attack can allow a penetration tester to intercept, manipulate, or take control of the communication between the key fob and the vehicle. Bluejacking and Bluesnarfing are older Bluetooth attacks that are less effective against modern BLE implementations. WPS PIN attacks target Wi-Fi Protected Setup, which is unrelated to key fobs and electric vehicles.

 Access Points (APs) are crucial in a wireless security assessment as they are the main points through which devices connect to the network. Identifying and securing APs ensures network integrity and security.

 Details:

A. Frequencies: Important but not as critical as identifying and assessing APs.

B. APs: Central to the network's security; assessing AP configurations, placements, and security settings is essential.

C. SSIDs: Identifying SSIDs is part of the assessment but does not provide a complete picture without evaluating APs.

D. Signal strengths: Useful for understanding coverage but secondary to assessing AP security.

 References: Wireless security assessments prioritize AP evaluation as they are the entry points to the network, as outlined in various wireless security frameworks and methodologies.

A disclaimer is a statement that limits the liability of the penetration tester and the client in case of any unintended consequences or damages caused by the testing activities. It should be included in the scope documentation to clarify the roles and responsibilities of both parties and to avoid any legal disputes or misunderstandings. Service accounts, tester experience, and number of tests are not essential elements of the scope documentation, although they may be relevant for other aspects of the penetration testing process. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 1: Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests1; The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002), Lesson 1: Planning and Scoping Penetration Tests2; What is the Scope of a Penetration Test?3

Nessus is a comprehensive vulnerability assessment tool that is widely used for conducting vulnerability assessments. It is known for its ability to generate detailed and easy-to-read reports, which makes it a preferred choice for security consultants who need to document their findings clearly.

Nessus scans for a wide range of vulnerabilities across different systems and applications. It provides a detailed report that includes the vulnerabilities found, their severity levels, and recommendations for remediation. This feature makes it ideal for security consultants who need to perform vulnerability assessments and present their findings to stakeholders in an understandable format.

References:

Nessus product page: Tenable Nessus

Use of Nessus in penetration testing reports: The reports generated by Nessus have been referenced in various HTB writeups such as those for Luke and Horizontall​​​​.

Given the Nmap scan results showing an open HTTP service on port 8080 running Microsoft IIS 9.0, the next logical step for the penetration tester would be to further explore the web server. Nikto is a web server scanner that can identify known vulnerabilities, configuration issues, and other security problems.

Using the command nikto -host http://10.22.2.2 will initiate a scan against the HTTP service on the target server, helping the tester to identify potential weaknesses that could be exploited.

References:

Nikto official documentation: Nikto Documentation

Examples of web server vulnerability scanning in penetration testing: Writeup​​.

To intercept the communications between an employee's wireless headset and smartphone, the penetration tester would likely use "Bluejacking" (B). Bluejacking involves sending unsolicited messages to Bluetooth-enabled devices, but in the context of penetration testing and security, it can also encompass techniques for intercepting or hijacking Bluetooth connections. This could allow the tester to eavesdrop on communications or even take control of the headset.

The Nmap command uses the Xmas scan technique, which sends packets with the FIN, PSH, and URG flags set. This is an attempt to bypass firewall rules and elicit a response from open ports. However, if the target responds with an RST packet, it means that the port is closed. Open ports will either ignore the Xmas scan packets or send back an ACK packet. Therefore, the information most likely indicates that all of the ports in the target range are closed. References: [Nmap Scan Types], [Nmap Port Scanning Techniques], [CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide: Exam PT0-002, Chapter 4: Conducting Passive Reconnaissance, page 127]

Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing access to network protocols. It is designed for low-level protocol access and crafted to perform various networking tasks from Python scripts. This toolkit is widely used in penetration testing for creating and decoding network protocols and for crafting and injecting packets into the network. Impacket supports a myriad of protocols like IP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, SMB, MSRPC, NTP, and more. With its vast array of functionalities, Impacket is very useful in protocol testing and attacks, like the ones a penetration tester would conduct.

Responder, on the other hand, is a LLMNR, NBT-NS, and MDNS poisoner that can be used for capturing NetNTLM hashes. Empire is a post-exploitation framework that allows the use of PowerShell for offensive security and PowerSploit is a collection of Microsoft PowerShell modules that can be used to aid penetration testers during all phases of an assessment.

Given these descriptions, Impacket is the tool that fits the context of the question due to its direct interaction with network protocols through Python.

 Using PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) encryption ensures that the report file is securely encrypted with the client's public key. Only the client can decrypt the file using their private key, ensuring confidentiality during transit.

 Details:

Option Analysis:

A. Creating a link on a cloud service and delivering it by email: This method is susceptible to interception or unauthorized access.

B. Asking for a PGP public key to encrypt the file: Provides end-to-end encryption ensuring that only the intended recipient can access the file.

C. Requiring FTPS security to download the file: While secure, it does not provide the same level of end-to-end encryption as PGP.

D. Copying the file on a USB drive and delivering it by postal mail: While physically secure, it is not practical and poses a risk of loss or theft.

 References: PGP encryption is a widely accepted method for securing sensitive data. It is recommended by many cybersecurity standards and best practice guides.

The Rules of Engagement (RoE) document is crucial when there's a dispute or issue with accepting a penetration test report. The RoE outlines the scope, methods, timing, legal considerations, and objectives of a penetration test. It serves as a guideline for both the client and the testing team on what is expected and permissible during the assessment. If there are issues with the report, referring back to the agreed-upon RoE can clarify whether the test was conducted within the agreed parameters and help resolve any disputes.

The signed authorization letter, statement of work, and non-disclosure agreement are also important documents but are more related to the permission, scope of work, and confidentiality aspects of the engagement, respectively, rather than the specifics of how the test was to be conducted, which is what the RoE covers.

Output encoding is a technique that prevents cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by encoding the user input before displaying it on the web page. This way, any malicious scripts or HTML tags are rendered harmless and cannot execute on the browser. Output encoding is recommended by the OWASP Top 10 as a defense against XSS1. In this case, the vulnerable code is using a scriptlet to display the employee ID without any validation or encoding, which could allow an attacker to inject malicious code through the id parameter. Output encoding would prevent this by escaping any special characters in the id parameter. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002) eBook, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1: Cross-site Scripting; Best PenTest+ certification study resources and training materials, Section 1: Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Attack; OWASP Top 10 2021, A7: Cross-site Scripting (XSS).

ARP poisoning is a technique that exploits the weakness of the ARP protocol to redirect network traffic to a malicious host. Ettercap is a tool that can perform ARP poisoning and other network attacks, such as DNS spoofing, SSL stripping, and password sniffing. Wireshark, Netcat, and Nmap are not designed for ARP poisoning, although they can be used for other purposes, such as packet analysis, network communication, and port scanning. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002) eBook, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1: ARP Poisoning; Best PenTest+ certification study resources and training materials, Section 2: ARP Poisoning.

The nmap command with the -p- flag scans all ports from 1 to 65535 on the target host. The -A flag enables OS detection, version detection, script scanning, and traceroute. Therefore, the command will scan 65,535 ports on the host 10.0.1.10 and perform additional analysis on the open ports. References:

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 2: Conducting Passive Reconnaissance, page 72-73.

•Nmap Cheat Sheet 2024: All the Commands & Flags - StationX1

•Nmap Commands - 17 Basic Commands for Linux Network - phoenixNAP2

After performing a web penetration test, using the OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) standards or methodologies would be the best choice for ranking the findings by criticality. OWASP is renowned for its comprehensive documentation and guidelines on web application security, including the well-known OWASP Top 10 list, which outlines the ten most critical web application security risks. This makes it an ideal reference for categorizing and prioritizing vulnerabilities discovered during a web penetration test.

While MITRE ATT&CK, PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard), and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) provide valuable frameworks and methodologies for cybersecurity, OWASP's focus on web applications specifically makes it the most suitable for this context.

The Nmap command in the question scans all ports on the remote host and identifies the services and versions running on them. The output shows that port 3306 is open and running MariaDB, which is a fork of MySQL. Therefore, the best command to discover an exploitable service would be to use the mysql-info.nse script, which gathers information about the MySQL server, such as the version, user accounts, databases, and configuration variables. The other commands are either misspelled, irrelevant, or too broad for the task. References: Best PenTest+ certification study resources and training materials, CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-002 Cert Guide, 101 Labs — CompTIA PenTest+: Hands-on Labs for the PT0-002 Exam

The nmap command with the —script=s7-info is specifically designed to interact with Siemens S7 PLCs, which are common industrial control systems. The -p 102 specifies the port associated with Siemens S7 communications. The -T3 timing option is chosen to minimize the risk of impacting the PLCs by not being overly aggressive in the scan timing, which is important in operational technology environments where PLCs can be sensitive to high network traffic. The other options listed do not specifically target PLC devices or use appropriate timing to minimize risk.

In the context of penetration testing, the primary contact is typically the first point of contact established before the penetration test begins. This person is usually a stakeholder or an individual who has the authority and responsibility over the system being tested. In the scenario where a critical system is taken down during off-hours, the primary contact should be notified first to ensure a prompt and coordinated response. The primary contact can then decide on the next steps, including escalating the issue to technical, secondary, or emergency contacts if necessary. This approach maintains the chain of command and ensures that the appropriate parties are informed in a structured manner.

The command wmic service get name,pathname,startmode is used by penetration testers to enumerate services and their configurations, specifically looking for services with unquoted paths. If a service's path contains spaces and is not enclosed in quotes, it can be exploited by placing a malicious executable along the path, leading to privilege escalation. For example, if the service path is C:\Program Files\My Service\service.exe and is unquoted, an attacker could place a malicious Program.exe in C:\, which would then be executed with the same privileges as the service when the service starts. Identifying such services allows penetration testers to highlight potential security risks that could be exploited for privilege escalation.

Communicating with the client point of contact during a penetration test, especially when a testing component crashes a system or service, is crucial for remediation. Remediation involves the process of correcting or mitigating vulnerabilities that have been identified during the test. In the context of a system or service becoming unavailable, it's essential to promptly address and resolve the issue to restore availability and ensure the continuity of legitimate business operations. This communication ensures that the client is aware of the incident and can work together with the penetration tester to implement corrective actions, thereby minimizing the impact on the business and further testing activities.

Client acceptance (A) is a critical post-report delivery activity that involves the client formally accepting the findings and conclusions of a penetration assessment report. This process usually includes a review of the findings by the client, discussions about the impact, and agreement on the accuracy and relevance of the reported vulnerabilities and issues. Ensuring client acceptance soon after the delivery of the report can prevent scenarios where the validity of findings is debated long after the assessment, as in the case described.

Data destruction process (B), attestation of findings (C), and lessons learned (D) are also important aspects of a penetration testing engagement, but they do not directly address the issue of the client disputing the findings well after the report has been delivered. Client acceptance ensures both parties are in agreement on the outcomes of the assessment, minimizing disputes about the findings later on.

When a penetration tester obtains a list of password digests using Responder, the next logical step is to attempt to crack these password hashes to retrieve the plaintext passwords. Hashcat is one of the most widely used tools for this purpose. It is a high-performance password recovery tool that supports a wide range of hashing algorithms and can utilize the power of GPU acceleration to significantly speed up the cracking process.

Hashcat is preferred over tools like Hydra, CeWL, and Medusa in this context because it is specifically designed for cracking password hashes rather than brute-forcing login credentials (Hydra, Medusa) or generating custom wordlists (CeWL).

References:

Hashcat official website: Hashcat

Usage examples in various penetration testing reports, including those involving password cracking and hash manipulation​​​​.

Burp Suite is a web application security testing tool that can intercept, modify, and forward HTTP requests and responses. It can be used to manipulate the data sent between an API and a mobile device, such as changing the content of the response before it reaches the device. Drozer is a framework for Android security assessment, but it does not intercept HTTP traffic. Android SDK Tools are a set of tools for developing Android applications, but they do not have the functionality to intercept and modify HTTP responses. MobSF is a mobile security framework that can perform static and dynamic analysis of Android and iOS applications, but it does not have the capability to intercept and change HTTP responses at an API level. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 8: Application Testing1; The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002), Lesson 8: Application Testing2; Burp Suite Documentation3

The penetration tester's discovery of passwords vulnerable to hash cracking suggests a lack of robust password policies within the organization. Among the options provided, implementing a blocklist of known bad passwords is the most effective immediate remediation. This measure would prevent users from setting passwords that are easily guessable or commonly used, which are susceptible to hash cracking tools like Hashcat.

Requiring passwords to follow complexity rules (Option A) can be helpful, but attackers can still crack complex passwords if they are common or have been exposed in previous breaches. Setting a minimum password length (Option C) is a good practice, but length alone does not ensure a password's strength against hash cracking techniques. Encrypting passwords with a stronger algorithm (Option D) is a valid long-term strategy but would not prevent users from choosing weak passwords that could be easily guessed before hash cracking is even necessary.

Therefore, a blocklist addresses the specific vulnerability exposed by the penetration tester—users setting weak passwords that can be easily cracked. It's also worth noting that the best practice is a combination of strong, enforced password policies, user education, and the use of multi-factor authentication to enhance security further.

The socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known is an error that occurs when the socket module cannot resolve the hostname or IP address given as an argument. In this case, the script is using sys.argv[0] as the argument for socket.gethostbyname, which is the name of the script itself, not the target IP address. The target IP address should be the first command-line argument after the script name, which is sys.argv1. Therefore, changing the script to use sys.argv1 as the argument for socket.gethostbyname will fix the error and allow the script to scan the ports of the target IP address. References:

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 5: Attacks and Exploits, page 262-263.

•socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known | Python1

•How do I fix the error socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known on debian/testing?2

An evil twin attack involves setting up a rogue wireless access point that mimics a legitimate one. This type of attack can be highly effective in a penetration testing scenario because it can intercept and capture data transmitted over the network without causing noticeable interruptions to the normal operation of the wireless network. Users are tricked into connecting to the evil twin instead of the legitimate access point, allowing the penetration testers to capture sensitive information. Unlike jamming, which disrupts the network, or bluejacking, which is limited to sending unsolicited messages, the evil twin can facilitate man-in-the-middle attacks seamlessly.

References:

OWASP Wireless Evil Twin Attack

Kali Linux Evil Twin Tutorial