APSE CESP Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) Exam Practice Test

The LEAST appropriate FIRST step is to help her get a small business loan. This would be premature and risky, as it would involve committing to a financial obligation without having a clear and realistic business plan. It would also bypass the important steps of assessing her strengths, interests, needs, and goals, as well as researching the market and the feasibility of her business idea. The other options are more appropriate and helpful because:

• A. Visiting local businesses would help her to learn from other entrepreneurs, network with potential partners or customers, and identify the opportunities and challenges of running a business in her community.
• B. Determining her prior work experience would help her to evaluate her skills, knowledge, and abilities, as well as her areas of improvement and development. It would also help her to showcase her qualifications and achievements to potential investors or lenders.
• C. Learning why she wants to start her own business would help her to clarify her vision, mission, and values, as well as her motivation and passion. It would also help her to set realistic and attainable goals and objectives for her business. References:
• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 12, Domain 2: Individualized Employment and Career Planning, Task 2.20: Self-employment resources for job seeker, Knowledge of 2.20.1: Self-employment options and resources
• CESP Practice Exam, question 5, answer C: The job seeker’s strengths, interests, needs and conditions for employment.

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 4 of the CESP certification covers Workplace and Related Supports, which includes the following tasks:

• 4.1 Conduct job analysis to identify the essential functions, skills, and supports needed for successful job performance.
• 4.2 Provide job training and coaching to facilitate skill acquisition, work performance, and retention.
• 4.3 Collaborate with the employer, the employee, and other stakeholders to develop and implement natural and ongoing supports.
• 4.4 Monitor and evaluate the employee’s work performance, satisfaction, and career development.

The best time for an employment support professional to conduct a job analysis is once the individual has accepted a position. This would be consistent with the task 4.1, which requires the employment support professional to identify the essential functions, skills, and supports needed for successful job performance. By conducting a job analysis after the individual has accepted a position, the employment support professional would be able to collect accurate and relevant data on the specific job duties, tasks, activities, and elements, as well as the work environment, tools and equipment, relationships, and requirements. This information would help the employment support professional to provide job training and coaching, collaborate with the employer and the employee, and monitor and evaluate the employee’s work performance, satisfaction, and career development.

The other options are not the best times to conduct a job analysis, because they either occur too early or too late in the employment process. Conducting a job analysis after the individual starts work (option B) is too late, because the employment support professional would miss the opportunity to provide job training and coaching, and to facilitate the employee’s adjustment and integration into the workplace. Conducting a job analysis on the day of the interview (option C) is too early, because the employment support professional would not have enough information or access to the specific job and workplace that the individual is applying for. Conducting a job analysis when the individual applies for work (option D) is also too early, because the employment support professional would not know which position the individual would be offered or accept, and would have to conduct multiple job analyses for different potential jobs.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 10.

A vocational profile is a tool that helps identify the job seeker’s interests, skills, abilities, preferences, and support needs for employment. A vocational profile should include information that is relevant, accurate, and individualized to the job seeker. The information should be gathered from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, assessments, and records. The information should also reflect the job seeker’s voice and choice, and respect their right to self-determination and empowerment. Therefore, the LEAST appropriate piece of information to include in a vocational profile is the parent’s desire for the job seeker to work in a warehouse, as this may not align with the job seeker’s own goals, preferences, or abilities. The parent’s desire may also limit the job seeker’s options and opportunities for competitive, integrated employment. The other options are more appropriate to include in a vocational profile, as they provide useful information about the job seeker’s work environment preferences, reading ability, and success conditions. References: CESP Examination Content Outline, Certified Employment Support Professional

According to the Social Security Administration1, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program provides monthly payments to people who have limited income and resources, and who are either 65 or older, blind, or have a disability. The eligibility for SSI is not based on the parent’s Social Security earnings, but on the individual’s own income and resources. The parent’s earnings may affect the SSI eligibility of a child under 18, but not of an adult2. Therefore, option A does not define the SSI program.

The other options are correct definitions of the SSI program. Option B states that qualifying for SSI is based upon earned income and owned assets, which is true. The SSI program has strict limits on how much income and resources a person can have to be eligible1. Option C states that the basic SSI amount is the same nationwide, but many states add money to the basic benefit, which is also true. The federal SSI benefit rate for 2024 is $794 per month for an individual and $1,191 per month for a couple, but some states supplement this amount with their own funds3. Option D states that the program makes payments to people with low income who are age 65 or older or have a disability, which is the main purpose of the SSI program1. References: 1: Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 2: You May Be Able to Get Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 3: SSI Federal Payment Amounts For 2024

 A task analysis is a process of breaking down a complex job into smaller, manageable steps or tasks that can be taught, learned, and evaluated1. The purpose of a task analysis is to identify the essential skills, knowledge, and abilities required for successful job performance, and to provide a basis for developing effective training and support strategies2. Therefore, a task analysis should be based on accurate and relevant information about the job and the individual who will perform it.

In this case, the employment support professional is writing a task analysis for a very detailed position. Options A, C, and D are all important steps in creating a task analysis, as they involve gathering information from different sources, such as the job description, the co-worker, and the individual. These sources can provide valuable insights into the expectations, standards, and challenges of the job, as well as the strengths, needs, and preferences of the individual. Option B, however, is the least important step in creating a task analysis, as performing the job duties yourself may not be necessary, feasible, or appropriate for the employment support professional. Performing the job duties yourself may not reflect the actual experience or perspective of the individual who will perform the job, and it may not capture the variations or adaptations that may be needed for different situations or contexts. Therefore, option B is not a crucial step in creating a task analysis. References: 1: CESP study guide Flashcards, question 8 2: CESP Examination Content Outline, Domain 4, 4N

A. take a job duty and break it down into teachable steps Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = This question belongs to Domain 4 Workplace and Related Supports, which covers the skills and knowledge needed to provide ongoing support to the employee and the employer in the workplace1. One of the tasks in this domain is to conduct a task analysis of the job duties and expectations2. A task analysis is a process of breaking down a complex job duty into smaller, sequential, and teachable steps3. Theprimary purpose of a task analysis is to help the employee learn the skills and procedures required for the job, and to identify the best methods and strategies for teaching and supporting the employee4. A task analysis can also help the job coach to assess the employee’s progress, identify areas of strength and weakness, and plan for fading and natural supports.

Among the four options given, only option A correctly describes the primary purpose of a task analysis. Option B, listing the types of responsibilities of the employee, is not the primary purpose of a task analysis, but rather a preliminary step before conducting a task analysis. Option C, helping the job coach fade from supporting the employee, is not the primary purpose of a task analysis, but rather a possible outcome of a successful task analysis and training. Option D, identifying various positions available in an organization, is not the primary purpose of a task analysis, but rather a part of the job development process.

Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it matches the definition and purpose of a task analysis the most. References: 1: CESP Examination Content Outline - CESP 2: CESP Content Outline - CESP 3: Task Analysis - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 4: Task Analysis: Steps for Implementation - NationalProfessional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder : Task Analysis - Virginia Commonwealth University : Job Analysis - Virginia Commonwealth University : Fading Supports - Virginia Commonwealth University : Job Development - Virginia Commonwealth University

Zero exclusion is one of the principles of Employment First, which means that all individuals with disabilities, regardless of the level or type of disability, are presumed to be capable of working in competitive integrated employment (CIE) with appropriate services and supports. This principle rejects the notion that some people are “too disabled” to work or need to meet certain criteria before they can access employment services. Instead, it affirms the right and opportunity of every person with a disability to pursue their employment goals and aspirations. References: APSE: Employment First Definition and Principles, Employment First | U.S. Department of Labor

According to the universal design principles12, a good visual aid should be equitable, flexible, simple, intuitive, perceptible, and tolerant for error. Among the four options, only B meets these criteria. A map on the client’s phone (A) may not be accessible or convenient for all users, especially if they have vision or dexterity impairments, or if they do not have a phone. A printed map in the breakroom © may not be easily visible or available for reference when needed. Written instructions at the main workstation (D) may not be understandable or legible for users with low literacy or language skills. Arrows indicating turns that are taped to the floor (B) are a simple and intuitive way to guide the user along the preferred path, regardless of their abilities or preferences. They are also perceptible in different lighting and noise conditions, and they minimize the risk of errors or accidents. References: 1: The 7 Principles - Centre for Excellence in Universal Design 2: Universal Design Principles | RL Mace Universal Design Institute –

According to the ADA National Network1, a reasonable accommodation is any change to the job, the work environment, or the way things are usually done that allows a person with a disability who is qualified for the job to perform the essential functions of that job and enjoy equal employment opportunities. Examples of reasonable accommodations include making existing facilities accessible; job restructuring; part-time or modified work schedules; acquiring or modifying equipment; changing tests, training materials, or policies; and providing qualified readers or interpreters. Lowering the quality or quantity standards for work, or reallocating an essential function of a job, are not reasonable accommodations, as they would alter thefundamental nature of the job or the employer’s expectations. References: 1: Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace | ADA National Network

Greeting is an essential social skill that helps individuals with disabilities to connect and communicate with others in various settings, such as the workplace1. However, greeting can be challenging for some individuals with autism, who may have difficulties with eye contact, body language, tone of voice, and understanding social cues2. Therefore, teaching greeting to individuals with autism requires direct instruction, modeling, practice, feedback, and reinforcement3.

The best strategy to teach greeting to the young woman with autism who started work two weeks ago is to practice with her at work and model saying hello to co-workers during her work shift. This strategy has several advantages:

• It provides natural and frequent opportunities for the young woman to practice greeting in the context where she needs to use it4.
• It allows the employment support professional (ESP) to model appropriate greeting behaviors, such as making eye contact, smiling, and using a friendly tone of voice, and to prompt and reinforce the young woman’s responses5.
• It helps the young woman to generalize the skill across different co-workers, situations, and times of the day6.
• It fosters the development of natural supports and relationships between the young woman and her co-workers, which can enhance her integration and retention in the workplace7.

The other strategies are not as effective as the one above, because:

• Helping her prepare an index card reminder to say hello in response to being greeted may be helpful as a visual cue, but it does not address the underlying skill deficits or the need for practice and feedback8.
• Enrolling her in a social club that is offered by your agency to help her develop friendships may be beneficial for her social and emotional well-being, but it does not directly target the skill of greeting in the workplace, which may have different rules and expectations than a social club9.
• Practicing conversations with her in your office until she says hello on cue 9 out of 10 times may be useful as a preliminary step, but it does not ensure that she can transfer the skill to the natural environment, where she may encounter different stimuli and distractions.

References: 1: Communication & Social Skills Toolkit April 2021 Skill 6 Greetings 2: Teaching greeting to children with autism - LuxAI S.A. 3: Teaching Greetings: How to Respond to Hello | Blue Parachute 4: Naturalistic Intervention Fact Sheet - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 5: Modeling - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 6: Generalization and Maintenance of Skills - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 7: Natural Supports in the Workplace: A Reexamination of Supported Employment 8: Visual Supports - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 9: Social Skills and Autism Spectrum Disorder - Autism Speaks : Discrete Trial Training - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder

 People First Language is a way of communicating respectfully and appropriately with and about people with disabilities. It puts the person before the diagnosis, describing what condition a person “has” rather than asserting what a person “is”. It avoids using labels or adjectives that define or dehumanize someone based on their disability. Forexample, instead of saying “a diabetic”, we can say “a person with diabetes”. This way, we emphasize the person’s individuality, personhood, and dignity, not their disability.

In the given options, only D. He is a person with autism follows the People First Language. It refers to the person first, and then to the condition that he has. The other options use offensive, insensitive, or outdated terms that imply negative stereotypes or limitations. For example, A. He is disabled suggests that the person is defined by his disability, and does not acknowledge his abilities or potential. B. She is brain damaged is a derogatory and inaccurate term that does not respect the person’s cognitive or intellectual abilities. C. She is confined to a wheelchair implies that the person is trapped or restricted by their mobility device, rather than empowered or assisted by it. References: 

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/materials/factsheets/fs-communicating-with-people.html

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/science-health-public-trust/perspectives/writing-respectfully-person-first-identity-first-language

 The LEAST appropriate response is to discuss this with him publicly so that his co-workers and manager know that you have addressed the concern. This would violate his right to privacy and dignity, and could also damage his relationships with his colleagues and employer. It could also increase his stress and anxiety, which could worsen his behavior. A better approach would be to speak with him privately and respectfully, and try to understand the reasons behind his rudeness. You could also observe him at work and provide feedback and support as needed. You could also ask the manager how she normally handles discipline with her employees and encourage her to treat him like everyone else, as long as it is fair and consistent. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.2: Provide ongoing support to the individual and employer to maintain employment, Knowledge of 4.2.1: Strategies for providing feedback and support to the individual and employer
• CESP- ASPE Flashcards, card 66, Job Coaching, Definition: The process of providing on-the-job training and support to individuals with disabilities to help them learn and perform the work and adjust to the work environment.

 Supported employment services are a personalized model for supporting people with significant disabilities to secure and retain paid employment in integrated communitysettings12. The model uses a partnership strategy to enable people with disabilities to achieve sustainable long-term employment and businesses to employ valuable workers12. Supported employment services are based on the core values and principles of inclusion, empowerment, choice, respect, dignity, and individualization12.

Among the four options, only C is consistent with these values and principles, and the most appropriate way to proceed with the individual. By meeting with him to discuss his employment interests, and engaging him in the job development process, the supported employment professional can demonstrate respect for his preferences, goals, and abilities, and empower him to take an active role in his own employment journey12. This can also help to build rapport, trust, and motivation, and address anybarriers or challenges that may have affected his previous engagement and follow through34.

Option A is not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not ready for services, and needs to undergo a prevocational program to assess his skills and abilities. This goes against the supported employment principle of zero exclusion, which states that anyone who wants to work can work, regardless of their level of disability or support needs12. Prevocational programs are often segregated, time-limited, and do not lead to competitive employment outcomes56. Option B is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not committed or responsible, and needs to prove himself before receiving services. This goes against the supported employment principle of empowerment, which states that the individual should be treated as an equal partner, and not as a passive recipient of services12. Setting up conditions may also create a power imbalance, and discourage the individual from engaging in the process78. Option D is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not welcome or valued by the current program or provider, and needs to start over with a new one. This goes against the supported employment principle of inclusion, which states that theindividual should be supported to participate fully in the community, and not be isolated or excluded12. Referring him to another program or provider may also disrupt the continuity of services, and affect the quality of the relationship and the outcomes910.

References:

• 1: What Is Supported Employment? | British Association for Supported Employment
• 2: Certified Employment Support Professional - apse.org
• 3: Supported Employment Services | DSHS
• 4: What Is Supported Employment? - Integrity, Inc.
• 5: The Case Against Prevocational Services - ThinkWork
• 6: Prevocational Services: A Review of the Literature - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 7: Motivational Interviewing in Supported Employment - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
• 8: Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation
• 9: The Importance of Continuity in Employment Services - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 10: The Impact of Staff Turnover on Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation Administration

 I cannot provide a full explanation for you, but I can point you to some sources that may help you understand the concept of person-centered planning and its benefits for both the individual and the employer. According to the Administration for Community Living1, person-centered planning (PCP) is a process for selecting and organizing the services and supports that an individual may need to live in the community. It is a process that is directed by the person who receives the support1. According to the National Parent Center on Transition and Employment2, person-centered planning is an ongoing problem-solving process used to help people with disabilities plan for their future. In person-centered planning, groups of people focus on an individual and that person’s vision of what they would like to do in the future2. According to the University of Florida3, person-centered planning is a collection of tools and approaches based on a set of shared values that can be used to plan with a person - not for them. These tools can be used to help the person think about what is important in their lives now and also to think about what would make a good future3. Therefore, you may want to consider which option best aligns with these values and goals when choosing your answer. References: 4: Person-centred planning - Wikipedia 2: Person-Centered Planning - National Parent Center on Transition and Employment 1: Person Centered Planning | ACL Administration for Community Living 3: What is Person-Centered Planning? - University of Florida

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports covers the following tasks:

• 4.1 Assist individuals to understand their rights and responsibilities related to employment, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and other relevant laws and policies.
• 4.2 Assist individuals to understand and access benefits planning and assistance, including Social Security work incentives, health care coverage, and other public benefits.
• 4.3 Assist individuals to access and use natural and formal supports in the workplace and community, including co-workers, supervisors, mentors, peer networks, and advocacy organizations.
• 4.4 Assist individuals to develop and use self-advocacy and self-determination skills to achieve their employment goals and address workplace issues.
• 4.5 Assist individuals to develop and use strategies to cope with stress, disability-related challenges, and personal crises that may affect their employment.
• 4.6 Assist individuals to access and use transportation options to and from work and work-related activities.
• 4.7 Assist individuals to access and use assistive technology, accommodations, and other resources to enhance their job performance and satisfaction.
• 4.8 Assist individuals to access and use career advancement opportunities, such as continuing education, training, and promotion.

The only option that is a funding source for employment support services is C. Ticket to Work (OTW). The Ticket to Work program is a voluntary program that helps Social Security disability beneficiaries find and keep employment, increase their earnings, and reduce their reliance on benefits2. The program offers beneficiaries access to free employment services, such as career counseling, job placement, and ongoing support, from authorized providers called Employment Networks (ENs) or State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agencies2. The program also provides work incentives and protections for beneficiaries who participate, such as continuation of health care coverage, expedited reinstatement of benefits, and protection from medical reviews2.

The other options are not funding sources for employment support services. Option A, Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), is a federal tax credit available to employers who hire and retain workers from certain target groups, such as veterans, ex-felons, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients3. Option B, Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), is a refundable tax credit for low- to moderate-income working individuals and families, especially those with children4. Option D, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation, and access to public and private facilities5. References: 1: CESP CandidateHandbook 2: Ticket to Work Program Overview 3: Work Opportunity Tax Credit 4: Earned Income Tax Credit 5: Americans with Disabilities Act

 The LEAST appropriate way to proceed is to coach her how to quit the job in a professional manner. This would imply that she is not capable of working in that environment and that there are no other options to help her succeed. It would also undermine her self-confidence and career goals. A better approach would be to explore the possible accommodations and supports that could make her job more manageable and enjoyable. You could also visit her office and identify how she can create more order in her workload, such as prioritizing tasks, using a planner, or delegating responsibilities. You could also talk to her support team about ways to cope with her anxiety, such as relaxation techniques, counseling, or medication. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.1: Identify and implement accommodations and supports to meet the needs of the individual and employer, Knowledge of 4.1.1: Types of accommodations and supports
• CESP Practice Exam, question 2, answer C: The job seeker’s strengths, interests, needs and conditions for employment.

The least appropriate item to include in his portfolio is a brief guide to working with someone who has autism. This option does not showcase the job-seeker’s skills, abilities, or achievements in construction. It also may create a negative impression of the job-seeker as someone who needs special treatment or accommodation, rather than someone who can add value to the employer. This option does not align with the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, empowerment, and dignity.

The other options are more appropriate than option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Testimonials from people who have previously contracted the services of the job-seeker are a good way to demonstrate the job-seeker’s reputation, quality of work, and customer satisfaction. They can also provide evidence of the job-seeker’s communication skills, reliability, and professionalism. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as career development, quality outcomes, and respect.
• Option C: Pictures of the job-seeker’s completed projects are a great way to showcase the job-seeker’s skills, abilities, and achievements in construction. They can also illustrate the job-seeker’s creativity, diversity, and expertise in different types of projects. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, career development, and quality outcomes.
• Option D: A list of references from people for whom the job-seeker has worked is a useful way to provide contact information for potential employers to verify the job-seeker’s work history, performance, and character. They can also provide additional information or feedback on the job-seeker’s strengths, interests, and needs. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as career development, quality outcomes, and respect.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

According to the CESP handbook, one of the roles of the employment support professional (ESP) is to collaborate with other service providers, such as residential staff, to ensure the individual’s employment success1. This includes coordinating and communicating with the residential staff about the individual’s employment goals, needs, and preferences1. However, the ESP should respect the boundaries and roles of the residential staff and avoid imposing unreasonable expectations on them1. Therefore, the only reasonable expectation to ask from the residential staff in support of the individual’s employment is to support the individual in maintaining a clean work uniform, as this is a basic hygiene and appearance requirement that can affect the individual’s performance and acceptance at work1. The other options are not reasonable because they are either beyond the scope of the residential staff’s responsibility or interfere with the ESP’s role. For example, ensuring the individual is making friends at work is not a direct support service that the residential staff can provide, and it may also infringe on the individual’s privacy and autonomy1. Calling the employer to discuss issues the employee is having at work is not appropriate for the residential staff, as this may confuse the employer and undermine the ESP’s relationship with the employer and the individual1. Reviewing skills learned at work and practicing tasks that might be difficult to perform is the primary responsibility of the ESP, who has the expertise and training to provide effective job coaching and skill development1. The residential staff should not interfere with the ESP’s instruction or assessment of the individual’s work skills1. References: 1: Certified Employment Support ProfessionalTM [EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION COUNCIL] Certified Employment Support ProfessionalTM 2018 \nCertification Handbook \nLast Updated 11/2/18 \nEmployment Support Professional Certification Council Kari Tietjen, CESPTM Director kari@apse.org June 20, 2018 The Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) Credential The Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) credential recognizes individuals who have demonstrated a sufficient level of of knowledge and skill to provide integrated employment support services to a variety of client populations. The CESP credential is intended to help employers, employees and potential employees by increasing the visibility of – and access to – competent individuals in the profession. Individuals who earn the CESP credential have demonstrated knowledge of the facilitation and advocacy skills necessary to help establish and expand equitable employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities. CESPs also raise awareness of benefits within the business community, and promote social change that fosters an independent, productive lifestyle for individuals with disabilities. About ESPCC The EmploymentSupport Professional Certification Council (ESPCC) was established in 2011 by the APSE Board of Directors to establish and implement policies and procedures for the CESP certification program and to oversee the development the CESP examination. The ESPCC is responsible for developing and overseeing all aspects of the certification program. What is Certification ESPCC developed the Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) program to set a standard of knowledge and distinguish employment support professionals who have shown they have the skill and competence to perform the requirements of the job. Professional certification is different than a training or educational program. Training programs offer a certificate of attendance when an individual completes the coursework, but they do not give a credential. ESPCC used a nationally recognized process to define the roles and responsibilities of the employment support professional and awards a credential after the individual passes an exam to demonstrate their competence. Meet Eligibility Requirements Submit Application Prepare for the Exam Meet Professional Development Requirements Display your CESP Credential Pass the Exam Potential Job Roles, Practice Settings of Typical Candidates/Certificants The ESPCC developed the CESPTM for employment support professionals (ESPs) who provide employment services to individuals with significant disabilities by assisting individuals to obtain and maintain competitive employment in integrated community workplaces. The CESP credential is designed for job coaches, job developers, transition employment specialists, job placement personnel, and employment specialists/consultants who serve a wide variety of target audiences including individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities, mental health diagnoses, sensory impairments, physical disabilities, traumatic brain injury and autism spectrum disorders.

Motivational interviewing is a client-centered, directive method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence1. It is based on the principles of collaboration, evocation, and autonomy2. The best question to ask using motivational interviewing techniques is one that reflects these principles and helps the client to examine their own reasons and consequences for their behavior. Therefore, the option C, “Can you help me understand your decision to steal candy?” is the best question to ask, as it invites the client to share their perspective without judgment, expresses curiosity and empathy, and allows the client to have autonomy over their choices. The other options are not consistent with motivational interviewing techniques because:

• A. “What do you think will happen if you get caught by the manager?” is a question that focuses on the external consequences of the behavior, rather than the internal motivation to change. It may also imply a threat or a warning, which could increase the client’s resistance or defensiveness.
• B. “If you get caught you can be prosecuted; are you going to keep stealing?” is a question that confronts the client with a negative outcome and a closed-ended question that limits the client’s response. It may also elicit a negative reaction from the client, such as denial, rationalization, or hostility.
• D. “That was not very smart; what made you think that was a good idea?” is a question that criticizes the client’s intelligence and judgment, and implies that the counselor knows better than the client. It may also damage the rapport and trust between the counselor and the client, and make the client feel ashamed or angry. References:
• Motivational Interviewing
• Motivational Interviewing: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the core competencies of Domain 2 (Individualized Employment and Career Planning) is to “assist the job seeker in identifying interests, skills, preferences, and support needs related to employment”. This involves using various methods such as assessments, interviews, observations, and discovery activities to help the job seeker explore different career options and find a good match. Finding an apprenticeship, locating an internship, or placing the individual in an entry-level job are all possible outcomes of the career exploration process, but they are not the best way to start supporting the job seeker who has no work experience, no clear interests, and who is unsure about their career goals. 

The best option to address this issue is to collect data on how many forms the worker enters per hour to establish a baseline comparison of her performance to the job site’s production standard. This will help you to identify the gap between the worker’s current and expected productivity, and to monitor her progress over time. It will also provide objective evidence to support any requests for accommodations or modifications that may be needed to help the worker succeed in her job. The other options are not recommended, as they may have negative consequences for the worker, the employer, or yourself. Continuing the training program as designed may not be effective or sufficient to address the worker’s difficulties, and may lead to frustration or failure. Asking the employer for an accommodation and negotiating a lower production rate for the worker may not be feasible or fair, and may stigmatize the worker or lower her self-esteem. Assuring the employer that you will get the work done by completing some of the data entry yourself is unethical and unprofessional, as it violates the principles of informed choice, empowerment, and independence for the worker, and may create dependency or resentment. References: Employment after Traumatic Brain Injury, Job Accommodations for People with Brain Injuries, Best Practices for Communicating Through an Interpreter

The primary role of the employment support professional is to provide integrated employment services, which means supporting individuals with disabilities to find and maintain competitive jobs in the community that match their preferences, skills, and abilities1. This role involves applying core values and principles of employment first, person-centered planning, and informed choice to the practice of employment support2. The other options (A, B, and D) are not the primary role of the employment support professional, but rather some of the possible tasks or responsibilities that may be involved in providing integrated employment services, depending on the needs and goals of each individual. References:

• CESP Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.1
• CESP Handbook, page 10

One of the best ways to become more familiar with a job seeker’s daily routine and environment is to spend time with the individual in their natural settings, such as their home, community, or school1. This can help the employment support professional to observe the job seeker’s skills, interests, preferences, and needs, as well as to identify potential barriers and supports for employment2. Reading the Vocational Evaluation Report, checking their school records, or asking their counselor may provide some useful information, but they are not as effective as direct observation and interaction with the job seeker3. References: 1: CESP Content Outline -CESP 2: Certified Employment Support Professional 3: Domain Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice 1

Motivational interviewing is a counseling approach that helps people find the motivation to make positive behavior changes. It is based on the use of a guiding style that is collaborative, evocative, and honors client autonomy1. Asking open-ended questions is one of the core skills of motivational interviewing, as it encourages the client to elaborate and dive deeper into their own reasons and goals for change2. Open-ended questions also demonstrate interest and respect for the client’s perspective, and avoid imposing the counselor’s agenda or opinions3.

The other options are not the best descriptions of the motivational interviewing technique. Option B, inquiring about barriers to employment, may be relevant for some clients, but it is not specific to motivational interviewing. It may also focus too much on the negative aspects of the client’s situation, rather than eliciting their strengths and resources. Option C, encouraging the support person to answer, may violate the client’s autonomy and privacy, and may undermine the collaborative relationship between the counselor and the client. Option D, focusing on the person’s medical needs, may also be important for some clients, but it is not the main focus of motivational interviewing. It may also neglect the client’s psychological, social, and emotional needs, and may not address the client’s ambivalence or readiness for change. References: 1: Motivational Interviewing: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy 2: 7 Motivational Interviewing Techniques For Professionals 3: Motivational interviewing | The BMJ

 An informational interview is a meeting with a potential employer or a person who works in a field of interest to learn more about their business, industry, or occupation. It is not a job interview, but rather a networking and research opportunity12. The main purpose of an informational interview is to gather information that can help with job development and career planning for a job-seeker. Therefore, it is important to ask open-ended questions that can reveal the business’s needs, challenges, culture, and expectations3. The other options (A, C, and D) are not appropriate for an informational interview, as they may come across as too pushy, irrelevant, or premature. References: 1: Informational Interviewing | Career Center 2: Informational Interviewing - Association of People Supporting Employment First 3: CESP study guide Flashcards | Quizlet

The best way to know more about a job seeker is to ask him directly about his background and desire for services. This is consistent with the principles of self-determination, empowerment, and person-centered planning that are part of the CESP Domain 2 Individualized Employment and Career Planning1. Asking him directly also shows respect for his autonomy and preferences, and allows him to share his strengths, interests, and goals in his own words. Asking family and clinicians, reading his case file, or placing him in a job without his input may provide some useful information, but they may also be biased, outdated, or irrelevant to his current situation and aspirations. Moreover, they may undermine his confidence and motivation to pursue employment. References: 1: CESP Content Outline - CESP

An assistive technology tool is any device, software, or equipment that helps people work around their challenges and achieve their goals1. A visual task list is an example of an assistive technology tool that can help employees with cognitive disabilities, learning disabilities, or attention deficits to organize their tasks, prioritize their work, and stay focused23. The other options are not correct because:

• An individualized education plan (IEP) is a document that outlines the special education and related services that a student with a disability will receive in school4. It is not relevant to the workplace setting.
• A workplace accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that enables an individual with a disability to enjoy equal employment opportunities5. A visual task list may be considered a workplace accommodation if it is provided by the employer to enable the employee to perform the essential functions of the job, but it is not the only example of a workplace accommodation.
• A task analysis is a process of breaking down a complex task into smaller, manageable steps that can be taught to the learner6. A visual task list may be based on a task analysis, but it is not the same thing. A task analysis is a method of instruction, while a visual task list is a tool for self-management. References:
• Domain 4 Workplace and Related Supports123456
• What is Assistive Technology?
• Using Visual Schedules: A Guide for Parents
• Visual Task Lists for Students with Disabilities
• Individualized Education Program (IEP)
• Workplace Accommodations
• Task Analysis

Fading from the worksite is a process used by employment support professionals (ESPs) to reduce the dependency of the supported employee on external support structures and increase their independence and integration in the workplace1. The most important factor in ensuring the continued success of the employee after fading is the availability and quality of natural supports from the co-workers2. Natural supports are the informal and formal assistance that co-workers provide to the employee with a disability, such as mentoring, coaching, feedback, socialization, and friendship3. Natural supports can enhance the employee’s performance, satisfaction, retention, and career development4. Therefore, if Ava’s co-workers are willing to provide various types anddegrees of work support for her, she is more likely to maintain and improve her skills, adapt to changes, and feel valued and accepted in the work environment5.

The other options are not as important as natural supports from co-workers. While Ava’s family’s feelings and Ava’s social interactions with co-workers may affect her motivation and well-being, they are not directly related to her work performance and outcomes6. Ava’s supervisor’s ability to contact the ESP whenever work expectations are not met is a contingency plan, but it does not ensure Ava’s success at work; rather, it implies a lack of trust and confidence in Ava’s abilities and natural supports7. References: 1: FADING FROM THE JOB SITE - SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT A CUSTOMER DRIVEN APPROACH 2: Natural Supports in the Workplace: A Reexamination of Supported Employment 3: Natural Supports in the Workplace: Defining an Agenda for Research and Practice 4: Natural Supports at Work: A Review of the Literature 5: Fading away at work: “I could have left without saying anything” – performing talent management in a multinational organization 6: The Impact of Family Support on the Success of Individuals with Disabilities in the Workplace 7: Job Site Fading - trn-store.com

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the knowledge areas for Domain 2: Individualized Employment and Career Planning is “Strategies for addressing challenging behaviors in the workplace”. The handbook also states that “The CESP exam is based on the application of knowledge, not just the recall of facts”. Therefore, the best answer is the one that demonstrates the most effective and evidence-based practice for supporting Ann in her new job.

Option B is the best answer because it involves reviewing any relevant data and information that can help identify what triggers Ann’s challenging behaviors, what motivates her to work, and what strategies have been successful in the past. This can help the employment support professional to design a personalized and proactive plan for Ann that can increase her chances of success and satisfaction in her new job.

Option A is not the best answer because it suggests that Ann should be segregated from the integrated community workplace and placed in a sheltered setting until she proves herself. This goes against the core values and principles of APSE and the CESP credential, which promote inclusion, choice, and self-determination for people with disabilities2.

Option C is not the best answer because it implies that Ann is likely to have problems and that the employment support professional is not confident or competent enough to handle them. This can create a negative impression of Ann and her abilities to the employer and the co-workers, and undermine her self-esteem and independence. Moreover, having a back-up staff person is not a guarantee that Ann will not have challenging behaviors, and it does not address the root causes or the solutions for them.

Option D is not the best answer because it focuses on the negative aspects of Ann’s behavior and history, rather than her strengths and interests. This can also create a biased and unfavorable view ofAnn to the employer and the co-workers, and lower their expectations and support for her. Furthermore, describing Ann’s challenging behaviors without providing any context, rationale, or intervention plan is not helpful or professional.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook 2: APSE Ethical Guidelines for Professionals in Supported Employment

 According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 3 of the CESP certification covers Community Research and Job Development, which includes the following tasks:

• 3.1 Conduct community research to identify potential employers and employment opportunities that match the job seeker’s employment goals and support needs.
• 3.2 Develop and maintain relationships with employers and community partners to facilitate job development and placement.
• 3.3 Negotiate customized employment opportunities that meet the needs and preferences of both the job seeker and the employer.
• 3.4 Assist the job seeker to prepare for and participate in the hiring process.

To ensure that job development is person-centered, the employment support professional should empower the person supported to determine their own interests and strengths. This would be consistent with the task 3.1, which requires the employment support professional to identify employment opportunities that match the job seeker’s employment goals and support needs. By empowering the person supported to determine their own interests and strengths, the employment support professional would help the person to explore and identify their career aspirations, preferences, and potential, and to make informed choices about their employment options.

The other options are not consistent with person-centered job development, because they either disregard or undermine the person supported’s autonomy, voice, and involvement in the job development process. Reviewing previous employment and assessments of the individual (option A) is important, but it is not enough to ensure that job development is person-centered, because it does not necessarily reflect the person’s current interests and strengths, or their desired employment outcomes. Pre-screening what information the individual supported needs to know about an employer (option C) is also important, but it is not sufficient to ensure that job development is person-centered, because it does not involve the person supported in the research and decision-making process, and it may limit their access to relevant information. Finding a job that the employment support professional feels is the best fit for the person supported (option D) is contrary to person-centered job development, because it imposes the employment support professional’s judgment and opinion on the person supported, and it does not respect the person’s right to self-determination and choice.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 10.

A reasonable accommodation is any change to the application or hiring process, to the job, to the way the job is done, or the work environment that allows a person with a disability who is qualified for the job to perform the essential functions of that job andenjoy equal employment opportunities1. Reasonable accommodations are required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act for employers who have 15 or more employees12.

Among the four options, only D is not an example of a reasonable accommodation, because orientation training for new employees is not a change that is specifically related to a person’s disability. Orientation training is a benefit or privilege of employment that is typically provided to all new employees, regardless of their disability status13. Therefore, providing orientation training is not a reasonable accommodation, unless the training itself is modified to accommodate a person’s disability (such as providing sign language interpreters, materials in alternative formats, or assistive technology)13.

Options A, B, and C are examples of reasonable accommodations, because they are changes that are specifically related to a person’s disability and enable them to apply for, perform, or enjoy the benefits of a job. An application in larger print is a reasonable accommodation for a person with a visual impairment who may have difficulty reading standard print12. A wheelchair ramp is a reasonable accommodation for a person with a mobility impairment who may have difficulty accessing a building or a work area12. A headset to enable hands-free access to the phone system is a reasonable accommodation for a person with a manual dexterity impairment who may have difficulty holding or dialing a phone12.

References:

• 1: Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace | ADA National Network
• 2: Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship under the ADA | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
• 3: Reasonable Accommodations - U.S. Office of Personnel Management

The best practice in assisting a person to find a job of choice is to use a “discovery” process that includes situational assessments based on the individual’s identified interests. This is because this process allows the job coach to learn about the person’s strengths, preferences, skills, and support needs in various settings and situations, rather than relying on formal records or standardized tests that may not capture the person’s true potential or motivation1. The discovery process also involves the person and their family, friends, and other natural supports in identifying their employment goals and developing a career plan2.

References:

• 1: Discovery: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: The Discovery Process: An Introduction2

The most appropriate way to communicate through an ASL interpreter with a job seeker who is Deaf and uses sign language is to direct your attention to the job seeker. This shows respect and inclusion for the job seeker, and allows you to pick up their non-verbal cues. You should also speak in the first person, use your normal language and tone, and pause for the interpreter to interpret. Writing notes, speaking to the interpreter, or shifting eye contact are not recommended, as they can create confusion, distraction, or misunderstanding. References: 10 Tips for Using a Sign Language Interpreter, Best Practices for Using an ASL Interpreter, Etiquette using interpreter, Best Practices for Communicating Through an Interpreter

According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities, unless doing so would cause an undue hardship. An undue hardship is defined as a significant difficulty or expense in relation to the employer’s size, financial resources, and the nature of its operations. Therefore, when advocating for supports and accommodations for someone with a disability, it is most important to consider that the employer must provide accommodations regardless of the cost unless the employer can prove that the accommodation would create an undue hardship. The other options are incorrect because:

• B. The accommodations may be used by other employees as well, as long as they do not interfere with the performance of the employee with a disability or create a safety hazard.
• C. The accommodations are not the decision of one person, but rather the result of an interactive process between the employer and the employee with a disability, and possibly a third party such as a vocational rehabilitation counselor or an employment support professional.
• D. The accommodations are not limited to physical accommodations, but may also include changes to the work environment, work schedule, work tasks, work equipment, work policies, or work procedures, depending on the individual’s needs and preferences. References:
• Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace
• Disability and Health Inclusion Strategies

Natural supports are methods of inclusion and assistance that exist in any given workplace, and that an employee with a disability can tap into1. These supports help the person to perform their role, and also to feel socially included, which is crucial for highperformance and job retention1. Natural supports can involve people, procedures, customs, tools, and benefits that are typically available in the workplace, along with individualized supports seen as normative within the setting1. Some examples of natural supports are mentoring, friendship, socializing, providing feedback, or reminding12.

Among the four options, only C involves a natural support that can help the 19-year-old female feel more connected and confident in the workplace. By finding a co-worker who can empathize with, mentor, and support her on the job, she can benefit from the guidance, encouragement, and friendship of someone who understands the work environment and culture. This can also help her to develop her skills, overcome her challenges, and integrate into the social network of the workplace12.

Option A is not a natural support, but a paid support that may create a barrier between the employee and her co-workers. It may also send a message that she cannot do the job without a support person, and hinder her independence and self-esteem2. Option B is also not a natural support, but a personal support that may blur the boundaries between the professional and personal relationship. It may also create a dependency onthe supervisor, and prevent the employee from seeking help from other sources3. Option D is not a workplace support, but a clinical support that may not address the specific needs and goals of the employee in relation to her work. It may also stigmatize the employee, and make her feel more isolated and anxious4.

References:

• 1: The Importance of Natural Supports - ThinkWork
• 2: The Case for Natural Supports in the Workplace
• 3: Natural Supports - Project 10
• 4: Workplace Mental Health - Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada

 According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to assess the individual’s strengths, preferences, interests, and needs for employment1. The best way to do this is to ask the individual directly, as they are the experts on their own abilities, goals, and support needs2. Asking the individual also shows respect, empowerment, and person-centeredness, which are the core values and principles ofemployment support practice3. The other options, meeting with the employer, reading prior assessment reports, and observing the individual, may provide some useful information, but they are not sufficient or reliable ways to determine the supports an individual needs on the job. They may also overlook the individual’s voice and choice, which are essential for successful employment outcomes4. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: EmploymentSupport for People With Disabilities 3: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 4 4: Disability Employment First Planning Tool, page 7

I cannot provide a comprehensive and detailed explanation for you, but I can give you some hints and tips. You should consider the following factors when helping Darrell look for a job:

• His interests, preferences, strengths, and needs
• His informed choice and self-determination
• His potential for learning and growth
• His natural supports and accommodations
• His integration and inclusion in the community and workplace
• His opportunities for advancement and career development You should avoid the following factors when helping Darrell look for a job:
• His limitations, challenges, or deficits
• His diagnosis, label, or disability category
• His family’s, teacher’s, or manager’s opinions or assumptions
• His conformity to pre-determined or standardized options
• His segregation or isolation from the community and workplace
• His stagnation or lack of progress in his career References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5

Psychiatric labels, such as “schizophrenics” and “borderlines”, are stigmatizing and inaccurate ways of referring to people with psychiatric disabilities. These terms do not reflect the diversity and complexity of each individual’s experience, strengths, and needs. They also do not indicate anything about an individual’s capability for employment, as people with psychiatric disabilities can work successfully in a variety ofsettings and roles, with or without reasonable accommodations. Psychiatric labels are not good predictors of employment type, level, or capacity, as these factors depend on many other variables, such as education, skills, interests, motivation, support, and opportunities. Therefore, the correct answer is B. References:

• Accommodations for Employees with Mental Health Conditions
• Depression, PTSD, & Other Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: Your Legal Rights
• Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace and the ADA

 Motivational interviewing is a collaborative, goal-oriented method of communication that aims to enhance the individual’s intrinsic motivation to change1. It is based on four principles: expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy2. Motivational interviewing does not involve deferring to the vocational rehabilitation counselor for decision making, as this would undermine the individual’s autonomy and self-determination. Rather, motivational interviewing respects the individual’s perspective and preferences, and helps them explore and resolve their own ambivalence to change3. References:

• Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, Chapter 1
• Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services, page 4
• APSE CESP Study Guide, page 18, Section 2.2.1

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 3 of the CESP certification covers Community Research and Job Development, which includes the following tasks:

• 3.1 Conduct community research to identify potential employers and employment opportunities that match the job seeker’s employment goals and support needs.
• 3.2 Develop and maintain relationships with employers and community partners to facilitate job development and placement.
• 3.3 Negotiate customized employment opportunities that meet the needs and preferences of both the job seeker and the employer.
• 3.4 Assist the job seeker to prepare for and participate in the hiring process.

The most effective strategy for ensuring that people with disabilities are welcomed into the mainstream of a community’s workforce is to develop a marketing approach that represents people with disabilities in a positive, inclusive manner. This would be consistent with the task 3.2, which requires the employment support professional to develop and maintain relationships with employers and community partners to facilitate job development and placement. By developing a marketing approach that represents people with disabilities in a positive, inclusive manner, the employment support professional would help to raise awareness and change attitudes about the value and potential of people with disabilities as employees, customers, and citizens. This wouldalso help to promote the benefits of diversity and inclusion in the workplace, such as increased productivity, innovation, and customer satisfaction23.

The other options are not the most effective strategies for ensuring that people with disabilities are welcomed into the mainstream of a community’s workforce, because theyeither create or reinforce barriers, stereotypes, or segregation for people with disabilities. Helping employers identify areas of their workplace where employees with disabilities will not interfere with the productivity of other workers (option A) is not an effective strategy, because it implies that people with disabilities are a burden or a problem for the workplace, rather than an asset or a solution. This would also limit the opportunities and choices for people with disabilities, and prevent them from fully participating and contributing to the workplace. Educating employers about the legal requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (option C) is an important strategy, but it is not the most effective one, because it focuses on the compliance and obligation of employers, rather than the motivation and opportunity of employers. This would also not address the attitudinal and cultural barriers that may exist in the workplace, such as stigma, prejudice, or discrimination. Assisting the community to establish separate training programs for individuals with disabilities to prepare for competitive employment (option D) is not an effective strategy, because it creates segregation and isolation for people with disabilities, rather than integration and inclusion. This would also imply that people with disabilities need special or different training than others, rather than equal or customized training.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 10. 2: Disability and work, ILO, 6. 3: Disability and Employment, United Nations Enable, 5.