Adobe AD0-E906 Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager enhanced connector Expert Exam Practice Test

In this scenario, the user is managing a marketing campaign in Workfront and wants to use an existing asset from AEM Assets. Since the enhanced connector is already installed and configured, the user can go to theDocumentsarea within the Workfront project, clickAdd new, and then select theExperience Manager integration.

This integration allows the user to browse assets stored in AEM and select the required asset, which will be linked to the Workfront project without the need to download and re-upload the file.

This seamless integration between Workfront and AEM Assets enhances workflow efficiency by enabling users to directly access and use assets from AEM within their Workfront environment.

For more information, refer to the documentation onWorkfront and AEM Asset Integration, which covers the process of selecting and using AEM-stored assets within Workfront.

In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) as a Cloud Service, deployments are handled through Cloud Manager, and all code, including third-party libraries, must be part of the versioned code repository. To deploy the third-party package provided by the vendor, it needs to be included as part of the AEM project’s codebase under theinstallfolder within the repository:

The package should be stored in the file;$(maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory)/install directory.

Once stored, the deployment will be handled through Cloud Manager’s deployment pipeline.

This ensures the third-party package is included in the standard deployment process and follows AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure model, which ensures that changes to environments are made only through deployments using Cloud Manager.

Option B is incorrect because installing a package directly to production via CRX Package Manager is not allowed in AEM as a Cloud Service. Option C would work for self-hosted AEM instances but not for AEMaaCS, where dependencies must be part of the Maven build.

For more information, refer to AEMaaCS deployment best practices and theCloud Manager documentation.

In this scenario, the reviewer needs to leave comments on an interactive web content URL and tag the designer. TheWeb Proofing vieweris the appropriate tool for reviewing interactive web content in Adobe Workfront. The Web Proofing viewer allows users to:

Review and commenton web-based content directly in the browser.

Tag usersin comments and updates.

Approve or rejectthe content with the necessary feedback.

Option A (Desktop Proofing viewer) is typically used for offline or downloadable content, and Option C (Legacy Proofing viewer) refers to an outdated tool that lacks modern proofing functionalities.

Refer toWorkfront’s proofing documentationfor more information on using the Web Proofing viewer for interactive content.

When configuring theWorkfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connectorto version files correctly in AEM, the following criteria must be met:

Same Name: The new version of the file must have the exact same name as the current version. This ensures that AEM recognizes the file as a new version of an existing asset rather than a completely new asset.

Same Location: The new version must be sent to thesame locationin AEM as the current version. If the file is uploaded to a different location, AEM will not recognize it as a version of the existing asset.

Option B (appending version numbers) is not required for versioning in AEM, as versioning is handled internally based on the file’s name and location. Option C (same metadata) is not necessary for versioning but could be relevant for other workflows or metadata synchronization.

Refer toAEM Enhanced Connector documentationfor detailed instructions on configuring versioning and asset management between Workfront and AEM.

When creating a log file in AEM, the proper practice is to configure it under the/apps/myproject/configurationpath for the specific runmode folders (e.g., config.dev, config.stage, config.prod). This ensures that the log file configuration is applied based on the environment.

Runmode-specific configurationensures that logs are generated for the correct environment (development, staging, production), following best practices for AEM development.

Option A suggests using the /apps/systemconfiguration path, which is not the recommended location for project-specific configurations. Option B suggests asking for admin access, but developers typically create logs through code configuration rather than direct access to the console.

Refer toAEM’s logging configuration documentationfor details on setting up logs for specific environments.

To enable the search of products by SKU number in AEM, two main configurations are required:

Multi Value Property Predicate: By using a Multi Value Property Predicate, users can search for multiple SKU numbers at once. This is crucial if product owners need to query for multiple products simultaneously.

Single Line Text Field for SKU: SKU numbers are typically unique, so adding aSingle Line Text fieldto the image metadata schema for SKU numbers ensures that each image has its own SKU field for accurate identification during searches.

Option D is incorrect because SKUs are usually single, unique identifiers, so a Multi Value Text field isn’t necessary for each SKU.

Refer to AEM’sdocumentation on customizing metadata schemasandAssets Admin Searchto implement these features.

In AEM, to limit the number of concurrent workflows running at the same time, you need to adjust theMaximum Parallel Jobssetting in the OSGI console. This setting controls how many workflow jobs can be processed simultaneously, and reducing this number will lower the load on the server by limiting the number of workflows that can run concurrently.

This setting can be found under theDay CQ Workflow - Workflow Engineconfiguration in the OSGI Web Console.

Options B and C refer to specific workflows and threads, but they do not directly address the overall system limit on concurrent workflow executions.

Refer to theAEM documentation on workflow scaling and performancefor more information on how to adjust these settings in the OSGI configuration.

In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is toshare the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.

Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.

Refer to Workfront’sdocumentation on document sharingfor detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.

TheAuthorpermission role is necessary for the design team members who need toedit the proofsbefore they are sent for review by legal and financial teams. This role allows them to make changes directly to the proof and upload new versions, which is essential for their work in this multi-stage automated workflow.

Author role: Grants permission to edit and manage the proof, which includes uploading new versions and making changes to the existing proof content.

Options B (Reviewer) and C (Approver) are more restrictive roles that do not allow for editing proofs.

Refer toWorkfront Proofing roles and permissions documentationfor more information on the different proof roles.

In this scenario, the company is looking to group projects based on a benefit calculation from a custom form. The most efficient way to achieve this grouping and reporting structure in Adobe Workfront is by creating avalue expressionon the view. This method allows you to dynamically link the benefit value from the request object to other reporting structures, including the project object.

Value Expression on View:The value expression acts as a direct link between the custom form's calculated field and the reporting or view settings, enabling the system to pull the benefit value dynamically from the request.

Request Object Linking:By linking to the source request object through the value expression, it allows for seamless integration of calculated values into the project reporting view, ensuring that the benefit groups (Level 1-4) can be reported accurately based on the defined thresholds (0, 1-5, 6-10, 11-15).

This approach is more efficient compared to creating multiple calculated fields across different objects, and it allows for better maintainability and adaptability in future changes.

References from Adobe Workfront documentation emphasize the use ofvalue expressionsin reports and views for linking and utilizing calculated fields across different objects, enhancing the flexibility and power of custom reporting capabilities. Text mode is not necessary here because it is primarily used for custom formatting or more advanced use cases that don't involve simple value transfers between objects.

For more detailed information, you can refer to the official Workfront Help documentation onCustom FormsandAdvanced Reporting Techniquesin Adobe Workfront, where calculated fields and value expressions are thoroughly covered.

To upload a new version of a document and ensure it is available in AEM Assets, the user must select theNew Versionoption in Workfront. This triggers the version control process where the updated file can be uploaded.

By choosing the Experience Manager integration after selectingNew Version, the system ensures that the latest version of the document is sent to AEM Assets, where it will replace the previous version without losing version history.

This workflow supports maintaining version control between Workfront and AEM, ensuring that the most current version of the asset is always available in both systems.

Refer to theWorkfront-AEM Enhanced Connector Guidefor further details on version control and document updates between Workfront and AEM.

To configure the Enhanced Connector in AEM, including features like automatic project-linked folder creation, comment syncing, and automatic publishing of assets, you should navigate to:

Tools > Workfront Tools > Workfront Tools Configuration: This is where you can access and configure the connector settings within AEM. From there, selecting the configuration and choosingPropertiesin the action bar allows you to adjust the required settings.

Options B and C reference incorrect paths (Cloud Services and Assets), which are not used for the Enhanced Connector configuration.

Refer toAEM’s Enhanced Connector documentationfor step-by-step instructions on accessing and configuring the connector.

In this case, the solutions consultant needs to limit thelegal team’s accessto read-only for all content in AEM. Since the legal team will be working in Workfront and accessing AEM via the enhanced connector, the best way to manage their access is to applyAccess Control Entries (ACEs)to the wf-workfront-users user group.

ACEsallow you to specify detailed permissions for a group or user in AEM, such as granting read-only access to specific resources or folders within the DAM.

Options A and C would either grant too much access (as in the case of the Everyone user group) or allow contributions, which is beyond the requirement of just reading access.

Refer toAEM Access Control Management documentationto learn more about setting up ACEs and managing permissions.

To motivate Marketing to endorse a single Workfront instance across the enterprise, the best first step is to initiateExecutive/Stakeholder Engagement. By getting senior leadership or key stakeholders from both the legal and marketing departments involved, it helps align the goals of the organization and illustrates the value of a unified system.

Executive engagementcan help overcome resistance from individual departments (such as Marketing) by emphasizing the strategic importance of having a centralized system and showcasing the benefits for the entire organization.

Options A (training on group admin functions) and B (demo tailored for multiple groups) are useful but would not be as impactful as engaging executives to drive the initiative from the top down.

Refer toWorkfront’s adoption and implementation strategiesfor more information on how to engage stakeholders effectively.

When configuring allowed HTTP request methods for /bin/workfront-tools on the AEM dispatcher, the safest and most appropriate methods to allow areGET, POST, and PUT. These methods cover the basic operations for retrieving data (GET), submitting data (POST), and updating data (PUT), which are typically required for the Enhanced Connector functionality.

GET: Used to retrieve data from the server.

POST: Used to send data to the server.

PUT: Used to update resources on the server.

Options A (DELETE) and B (HEAD, DELETE) are riskier and less commonly needed for this use case, and DELETE should be restricted unless absolutely necessary to prevent unintended deletions.

Refer toAdobe documentation on Dispatcher securityfor best practices regarding allowed HTTP methods.

The features requested by the customer, such as automatic folder creation, synchronization of Workfront document custom form values to AEM asset metadata, and automatic publication of assets to Brand Portal upon project completion, rely onEvent Subscriptionsin the enhanced connector configuration.

Event Subscriptionsare triggered when certain events occur, such as project completion or updates to custom form values, ensuring that the correct actions (like folder creation or asset publication) happen automatically.

Option A (Workflows) would be used for content approval processes but not for these specific automatic actions. Option B (Webhooks) can handle external notifications but is not directly relevant for these tasks within AEM and Workfront.

For more information, refer toAEM Enhanced Connector documentationon Event Subscriptions and their use in automating processes.