ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Certified Fraud Examiner - Fraud Prevention and Deterrence Exam Exam Practice Test

Conducting a Fraud Risk Assessment:

Both internal and external parties can effectively conduct fraud risk assessments.

Internal teams provide organizational insight, while external parties bring objectivity and specialized expertise.

Analysis of Other Options:

B. External party only: Independence is important but not mandatory for effectiveness.

C. Belief that fraud cannot happen: This would bias the process and render the assessment ineffective.

D. Limiting management's influence: Management should actively participate to ensure comprehensive insights.

Conclusion:Fraud risk assessments can be effectively conducted by both internal and external parties.

References:ACFE guidance on fraud risk assessments​​.

Understanding Conflicts of Interest:

The ACFE Code of Professional Ethics prohibits any engagements that impair the fraud examiner's objectivity, even with disclosure.

Ownership interests in a client organization create significant potential for bias, compromising the integrity of the evaluation.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Secret infiltration: This is a clear ethical violation.

B. Engagements reducing employer duties: This constitutes a conflict of interest.

D. Representing both sides: Prohibited under the ACFE Code due to conflicting responsibilities.

Conclusion:Option C is a prohibited conflict of interest under the ACFE Code.

References:ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and conflicts of interest guidelines​​.

 ACFE Code of Professional Ethics:

The ACFE Code of Ethics prohibits fraud examiners from making absolute statements about the absence of fraud. Fraud cannot be definitively ruled out based on an examination's findings.

 Why B is Correct:

Stevens cannot state that the organization is "free of fraud," as fraud detection is inherently limited by the scope and methods of the examination. Such a statement could mislead stakeholders and compromise ethical standards​​.

Professional Skepticism Defined:

Professional skepticism is an attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of evidence. Fraud examiners must remain vigilant to indications of potential fraud throughout an engagement.

Consistent Application:

ACFE standards emphasize that skepticism should be applied consistently, even if initial findings do not indicate fraud, to avoid overlooking potential risks.

Why D is Correct:

Relaxing skepticism can lead to missed evidence or poor judgment, undermining the examination's effectiveness​​.

Fraud Triangle and Employee Support Programs:

The Fraud Triangle identifies pressure, opportunity, and rationalization as the key elements contributing to fraud.

Employee support programs help alleviate pressures, such as financial stress or workplace dissatisfaction, which could lead employees to commit fraud.

Analysis of Options:

A. Rationalization: Not addressed directly by support programs.

B. Lack of integrity: Focuses on individual ethics, not pressures.

C. Opportunity: Mitigated through controls, not support programs.

Conclusion:Employee support programs address the pressure element of the Fraud Triangle.

References:ACFE Fraud Triangle framework​​.

G20/OECD Principles Overview:

The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance are international guidelines aimed at enhancing economic efficiency and promoting stable financial systems.

Equitable Treatment of Shareholders:

The principles stress fairness and the protection of all shareholders' rights, particularly minority shareholders, ensuring they are treated equally.

Why D is Correct:

Equitable treatment is a fundamental tenet of the Principles, which strive to maintain trust and integrity in governance practices across jurisdictions​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Standards​​.

ISA Standards and International Corporate Governance Best Practices​​.

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance​.

Purpose of the Task:

The team seeks candid feedback on ethical tone, which requires a confidential and direct interaction method.

Comparison of Techniques:

A. Interviews: Effective for obtaining one-on-one feedback in a private setting.

B. Focus groups: Group dynamics may inhibit candid responses due to peer pressure.

C. Anonymous feedback mechanisms: These provide insights but lack the depth and follow-up opportunities of interviews.

D. Surveys: While useful for broad input, surveys are less effective for detailed exploration of ethical tone.

Conclusion:Interviews are the most helpful technique for gathering one-on-one candid feedback.

References:ACFE guidance on fraud risk assessments and effective data collection methods​​.

ACFE research highlights that an unwillingness to share duties is one of the most common red flags exhibited by fraud perpetrators. This behavior often indicates a desire to conceal fraudulent activities. Most fraudsters do not have prior convictions, and frauds committed by executives tend to cause higher losses compared to those committed by staff-level employees.

=================

Rational Choice Theory Overview:

This theory asserts that individuals make conscious decisions to commit crimes after weighing the costs (risk of detection and punishment) and benefits.

Why D is Correct:

Rational choice theory aligns with strategies to deter crime by reducing opportunities and increasing personal risks.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A (Differential association theory): Explains crime as learned behavior.

B (Routine activities theory): Focuses on environmental factors.

C (Justification of action theory): Not a recognized criminological theory​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and Fraud Examination Guide​​.

Criminological theories and governance frameworks in fraud prevention​​.

Case studies on indirect fraud costs and ethical decision-making​​.

 Indirect Costs of Fraud:

Reputational damage is a significant indirect cost of fraud. It can lead to loss of customer trust, reduced employee morale, and long-term financial impact.

 Why A is Correct:

Quantifying reputational damage is challenging due to its intangible nature. The effects often manifest over time and are influenced by various factors, making precise calculation difficult​​.

McCaghy's Perspective on Organizational Deviance:Criminologist Charles McCaghy identified regulatory pressure as a significant factor influencing organizational deviance. Excessive or poorly implemented regulations can lead companies to cut corners or engage in fraudulent behavior to remain competitive.

Supporting Analysis:

Regulatory pressure can create a perception that compliance is too costly or burdensome, leading to unethical practices.

This aligns with the concept of "strain theory," where organizations under pressure may resort to deviance.

Conclusion:McCaghy's assertion that regulatory pressure is a key driver of organizational deviance is accurate.

References:ACFE study materials on regulatory challenges and organizational fraud​​.

Understanding Fraud Risk Management Responses:

Risk mitigation refers to implementing controls or measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk.

In this case, by implementing additional internal controls, management aims to mitigate the identified fraud risk.

Definition of Other Options:

A. Assuming the risk: This refers to accepting the risk without taking action to mitigate it. This is generally done when the risk is deemed tolerable.

C. Avoiding the risk: This involves changing business practices or ceasing activities to eliminate the risk entirely.

D. Transferring the risk: This occurs when the responsibility for the risk is shifted to another party, such as through insurance.

Conclusion:The described response clearly aligns with risk mitigation, as it focuses on reducing the risk through internal control measures.

References:ACFE study materials on fraud risk assessment and management approaches​​.

 ISSAI Standards:

The International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) require government auditors to consider fraud and abuse during financial audits. Abuse includes improper use of authority or resources, which may not always meet the legal threshold of fraud but still warrants attention.

 Expanded Audit Scope:

Unlike private-sector audits, public-sector audits often have broader objectives, requiring vigilance for misuse of public funds and resources.

 Why A is Correct:

Staying alert to abuse ensures comprehensive accountability, aligning with ISSAI's objectives​​.

 Responsibility of Auditors:

Under International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 240, auditors are required to investigate any indications of fraud, regardless of the materiality of the misstatement.

Evidence of intentional misstatements indicates the potential for broader fraudulent activity, necessitating a reassessment of audit procedures.

 Importance of Fraud Indicators:

Even if the misstatement does not exceed the materiality threshold, it represents a significant risk factor that could compromise the reliability of the financial statements.

 Why B is Correct:

Adjusting audit procedures ensures that the audit team addresses the broader implications of the fraud risk while maintaining professional skepticism and compliance with auditing standards​​.

 Professional Responsibility Under ACFE Code of Ethics:The ACFE Code of Professional Ethics requires Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) to disclose material information to the proper authorities. When fraud is discovered, the CFE must act in the best interest of the organization while adhering to ethical standards.

In this scenario, Gray must report Green's involvement in unrelated fraud to ABC Corporation's board of directors. This ensures transparency and accountability without breaching client confidentiality unnecessarily.

 Relevant Principles from ACFE Code of Ethics:

Integrity: CFEs must act honestly and report findings to the appropriate parties.

Objectivity: The CFE must avoid conflicts of interest and ensure impartiality in all findings and disclosures.

 Board Reporting Responsibility:

Reporting to the board is appropriate because they are responsible for corporate governance and oversight. Law enforcement involvement should follow organizational protocols unless laws explicitly mandate direct reporting​​.

 CFE Ethical Responsibilities:

As per the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics, fraud examiners must ensure transparency in their professional conduct. They cannot promise confidentiality if the information must be disclosed to management or other authorities as part of the investigation.

 Why D is Correct:

Agreeing to confidentiality in this situation would breach ethical and legal obligations, especially if the information pertains to fraud or misconduct that the organization needs to address.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A and B: Attempting to maintain confidentiality is misleading and unprofessional.

C: Taking the request directly to management without clarification could breach trust prematurely​​.

 Corruption and Fraud Risks:

Corruption involves abuse of power for personal or organizational gain and includes bribery, kickbacks, and aiding vendor fraud.

 Why B is Correct:

Espionage by competitors is not typically classified as corruption, as it does not directly involve abuse of internal authority or a relationship of trust. It is instead an external threat.

 Other Options:

A, C, and D are classical examples of corruption-related fraud risks​​.

Fraud Prevention Through Performance Management:Performance measurement and management programs can play a role in preventing fraud by ensuring accountability, setting ethical expectations, and reinforcing organizational goals.

Analysis of Options:

A. Ethics-based metrics: Encourages accountability and reduces fraud risks.

B. Regular training: Ensures employees are competent, reducing errors and opportunities for fraud.

D. Reasonable performance goals: Prevents pressure to commit fraud by setting realistic benchmarks.

C. Loosely defined job descriptions: This creates ambiguity, reduces accountability, and increases the risk of fraud, making it ineffective.

Conclusion:Option C is not an effective way to prevent fraud.

References:ACFE fraud prevention strategies and organizational best practices​​.

 Internal Auditors' Role in Fraud Risk Management:

Internal auditors evaluate management’s commitment to overseeing and addressing fraud risks as part of their assurance role.

 Why A is Correct:

Oversight of fraud risk management is a management responsibility, and internal auditors assess whether this responsibility is effectively retained and executed.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B: Reporting to regulators is not a core responsibility of internal auditors.

C: Internal auditors provide evaluation, not direct oversight.

D: Attesting financial statement accuracy is the responsibility of external auditors, not internal auditors​​.

Diane Vaughan’s Research:

Vaughan highlights that linking employee performance goals with company goals can create undue pressure, fostering an environment where unethical behavior becomes rationalized.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Diversity in hiring: Encourages broader perspectives and does not inherently lead to crime.

B. Rewarding challenges to the status quo: Promotes innovation and integrity, reducing crime risk.

Conclusion:Management’s linking of performance goals with company goals is the factor most associated with increased crime inclination.

References:ACFE criminological studies and Diane Vaughan’s findings​​.

Fraud Discovered During an Audit:

Under ISAs, auditors must communicate findings of fraud to the appropriate governance body, such as the audit committee or board of directors.

This ensures accountability and allows the organization to take appropriate remedial action.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Confront management: This could compromise the investigation and is not the auditor's role.

B. Report to regulators: Not immediately required unless legal reporting obligations apply.

D. Confidentiality: Confidentiality rules allow communication with governance bodies as part of the audit process.

Conclusion:Reporting findings to the audit committee aligns with ISA requirements and best practices.

References:International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 240: Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud​​.

Internal Auditor's Role in Fraud Risk Management:

Internal auditors are not directly responsible for establishing or maintaining anti-fraud controls (Option D). This responsibility lies with management.

They are also not responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that financial statements are free of fraud (Option A). This is the role of external auditors.

Oversight of management's fraud risk actions (Option B) is primarily a governance role, not the auditor's direct responsibility.

Internal auditors focus on identifying and assessing fraud risks, evaluating controls, and recommending further action when necessary.

Conclusion:Option C aligns with the internal auditor's responsibilities as per the standards outlined in the ACFE's fraud risk management framework.

References:ACFE documentation on internal auditing responsibilities and fraud risk assessments​​.

Three General Approaches to Controlling Corporate Crime:

Government Intervention: Strong regulations and enforcement to ensure accountability.

Voluntary Corporate Changes: Encouraging ethical practices through organizational policies.

Consumer Action: Pressure from consumers demanding corporate responsibility.

Why D is Incorrect:

Media blacklisting is not a formal or systematic approach to controlling corporate crime. It is a consequence rather than a preventive or corrective measure.

References:

ACFE and corporate governance frameworks emphasize formal mechanisms like government intervention and organizational self-regulation​​.

Integration of Fraud Risk Assessment in Audits:

The fraud risk assessment provides valuable input but does not replace the auditor’s independent responsibility to identify and assess fraud risks.

Why B is Correct:

Professional auditing standards require auditors to perform their own risk assessments, and the fraud risk assessment is only a tool to enhance this process.

Why Other Options are Correct:

A, C, and D reflect appropriate uses of fraud risk assessments in the audit process, such as increasing awareness and designing effective audit tests​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and Fraud Examination Guide​​.

COSO frameworks for corporate governance and fraud risk management​​.

Standards for incorporating fraud risk assessments into the audit process​​.

 Definition of Focus Groups:

Focus groups involve small groups of individuals discussing a specific topic under the guidance of a facilitator. This technique is used to gather qualitative insights through direct interaction and observation.

 Why A is Correct:

Observing employee interactions during a focus group provides rich, contextual data about attitudes, understanding, and engagement with fraud awareness training.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B (Surveys): Collect quantitative data but lack interaction and observational opportunities.

C (Anonymous feedback mechanisms): Useful for confidentiality but do not allow observation.

D (Interviews): Individualized and do not involve group dynamics​​.

Composition of Fraud Risk Assessment Teams:

Effective teams require diverse perspectives, skills, and experiences to identify and address fraud risks comprehensively.

Why C is Incorrect:

Limiting team size to three individuals restricts diversity and may not provide sufficient expertise for a thorough assessment. Larger teams, with a range of skills, are often necessary.

Why Other Options are Correct:

A: Experience in gathering information is critical for the effectiveness of the team.

B: Including external experts adds objectivity.

D: Diverse perspectives enhance the assessment's scope​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and Standards​​.

ISA standards on audit procedures and unpredictability​​.

Fraud risk assessment guidelines from COSO and ACFE resources​​.

According to the ISAs, auditors are required to communicate identified instances of fraud to those charged with governance of the organization. This ensures that the appropriate individuals within the organization are informed and can take necessary corrective actions. Reporting findings to the media or confronting individuals directly is not considered an appropriate course of action.

=================

Scope of Fraud Risk Assessment:

The fraud risk assessment team must consider various factors, including:

A. Incentive programs: Can create pressures that lead to fraud.

B. Management override of controls: A key risk for fraud occurring despite existing safeguards.

C. Risks to reputation: Fraud incidents can harm the organization's public image.

Comprehensive Discussion:

Considering all these factors ensures a thorough identification of inherent fraud risks.

Conclusion:The fraud risk assessment team should discuss all listed items.

References:ACFE fraud risk assessment guidance​​.

Purpose of Anti-Fraud Controls:

Preventive controls deter fraud before it occurs, making them the primary focus of an effective anti-fraud program.

Detective controls identify fraud after it has occurred, serving as a secondary line of defense.

Analysis of Options:

A. Fully eliminates risk: No system can fully eliminate fraud risk.

B. Focus on detective controls: Less effective than prevention.

D. Increases perception of detection: Important but not the primary focus.

Conclusion:An effective anti-fraud system emphasizes preventive controls.

References:ACFE guidance on fraud control systems​​.

Ethical Responsibilities of a CFE:

Under the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics, a Certified Fraud Examiner has the responsibility to report all relevant findings honestly and comprehensively, even if no fraud is identified.

Rule 2 states that CFEs must "perform all professional engagements with due diligence" and report any material findings.

Expressing Opinions on Deficient Controls:

CFEs are expected to provide constructive recommendations, including noting control deficiencies that could lead to fraud or operational risks.

Failing to express an opinion on deficiencies would not align with professional standards of diligence and full disclosure.

Conclusion:Black is permitted, and indeed encouraged, to express his professional opinion on the deficient controls as part of his ethical obligations.

References:ACFE Code of Professional Ethics, specifically rules related to diligence and full disclosure​​.

 ISO 31000:2018 Guidelines:

This standard emphasizes that a risk management framework should align with the organization’s size, complexity, objectives, and operations to ensure effectiveness and relevance.

 Why A is Correct:

Proportionality ensures that resources are allocated efficiently, addressing risks that directly impact the organization’s goals while avoiding overcomplication.

 References:

ISO 31000:2018 risk management principles​​.

Five Components of COSO’s Internal Control Framework:

A. Control activities: Policies and procedures to ensure objectives are met.

C. Risk assessment: Identifying and analyzing risks.

D. Monitoring: Ongoing evaluation of control effectiveness.

Control environment: Includes the tone at the top and organizational ethics.

Information and communication: Facilitates the flow of relevant information.

Explanation of Ethical Culture:

While ethical culture is critical to the control environment, it is not one of the five standalone components of the framework.

Conclusion:Ethical culture is not a separate component but a part of the control environment.

References:COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework documentation​​.

 Responsibilities of the Board of Directors:

The board is primarily responsible for oversight, governance, and ensuring the organization operates in the best interest of stakeholders. Key responsibilities include:

Acting as intermediaries between shareholders and management.

Safeguarding resources and assets.

Assessing management’s strategies and decisions.

 Why C is Correct:

Directing employees is a management responsibility, not a board function. The board focuses on oversight rather than operational execution.

 References:

ACFE governance principles emphasize the separation of oversight and operational roles​​.

 Treadway Commission Recommendations:

The National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Treadway Commission) issued guidelines to strengthen financial reporting integrity and reduce fraud risks.

One key recommendation was to ensure that the audit committee is well-resourced and has sufficient authority to oversee financial reporting processes effectively.

 Audit Committee Role:

An adequately empowered audit committee improves oversight, supports the internal audit function, and ensures proper implementation of controls to prevent and detect fraud.

 Why D is Correct:

This recommendation directly addresses the reduction of fraud probability by enhancing oversight capabilities​​.

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics Overview:

The Code explicitly prohibits unethical behavior, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and illegal activities. However, drawing evidence-based conclusions is encouraged as part of professional practice.

Why B is Correct:

Drawing conclusions based on evidence is central to the fraud examination process and is explicitly supported by ACFE standards.

Why Other Options are Prohibited:

A, C, and D: Engaging in unethical, conflicting, or illegal activities violates ACFE ethical guidelines​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and Code of Professional Ethics​​.

Best practices for fraud risk assessment and reporting​​.

Reporting standards and ethics in fraud examination​​.

Responsibility for Anti-Fraud Program Effectiveness:

Management holds ultimate responsibility for designing, implementing, and maintaining an effective anti-fraud program.

Internal and external auditors, as well as compliance functions, provide oversight and recommendations but are not directly responsible for the program's effectiveness.

Conclusion:Management is ultimately accountable for ensuring the success of the anti-fraud program.

References:ACFE guidelines on fraud risk governance and management roles​​.

Elements of Routine Activities Theory:

This theory posits that crime occurs when three elements converge:

Availability of suitable targets.

Absence of capable guardians.

Presence of motivated offenders.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Conditioning theory: Focuses on learned behaviors through reinforcement.

C. Rational choice theory: Examines decision-making processes of offenders.

D. Social control theory: Relates to societal bonds preventing deviant behavior.

Conclusion:Routine activities theory best explains the convergence of these elements leading to crime.

References:Criminological theories referenced in ACFE study materials​​.

Rational choice theory posits that crime is a deliberate and rational decision made by individuals who weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. Perpetrators commit crimes when they believe the potential benefits outweigh the risks. This theory also supports deterrence measures that increase the perceived risks or reduce the benefits of committing crimes, thereby discouraging rational actors from engaging in fraudulent behavior.

​

=================

Purpose of Fraud Risk Assessment:

The goal is to identify vulnerabilities to fraud and implement preventive measures, not to wait for conclusive evidence of fraud before designating high-risk areas.

Proactive Identification:

High-risk areas are identified based on susceptibility to fraud (e.g., lack of controls, high cash transactions), even if no fraud has been detected. This approach allows organizations to act preemptively.

Improving Fraud Awareness:

Employee education and behavior monitoring are integral components of the assessment process to reduce fraud risks.

Incorrect Assumption in D:

Waiting for conclusive evidence contradicts the proactive nature of fraud risk assessment and undermines its preventative function​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics​​.

Auditor Essentials on fraud prevention and deterrence principles​.

COSO and risk assessment frameworks in internal controls​​.

Tone at the Top:

Management must set a strong example by adhering to the same ethical standards as employees.

Visible adherence builds trust and reinforces an anti-fraud culture.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Checklist of initiatives: Helpful but insufficient by itself.

B. Dissuading challenges: This is counterproductive, as it discourages transparency and accountability.

D. All of the above: Incorrect, as Option B is detrimental to an anti-fraud culture.

Conclusion:Visibly adhering to ethics policies is the most effective action.

References:ACFE resources on fostering an ethical organizational culture​​.

Management is ultimately responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of the organization’s anti-fraud program. They set the tone at the top, establish internal controls, and ensure that the necessary resources and oversight mechanisms are in place to prevent and detect fraud. Other stakeholders, such as auditors and compliance officers, provide support but do not bear ultimate responsibility.

=================

 Research Findings by Silk and Vogel:

Their research highlights that business leaders often justify non-compliance with regulations by arguing that adhering to such rules significantly increases operational costs and reduces profitability.

 Rationalization in Legal Violations:

This rationalization is consistent with the fraud triangle concept, where rationalization serves as a justification for unethical or illegal actions.

 Why A is Correct:

This accurately represents a common justification for regulatory non-compliance as documented in fraud and compliance research​​.

Analysis of Each Scenario:

A. Rodrigo: Reporting unrelated findings without a clear mandate violates principles of focus and relevance under the ACFE Code.

B. Vivian: Overlooking evidence demonstrates a lack of due diligence and professionalism.

C. Tom: Complying with a court order is permissible, but failure to safeguard client confidentiality before receiving the order constitutes a breach.

Ethical Standards:

Each scenario demonstrates a failure to meet the ethical and professional responsibilities outlined in the ACFE Code.

Conclusion:All scenarios represent violations of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

References:ACFE Code of Professional Ethics, particularly diligence and confidentiality provisions​​.

Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:

Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.

Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Element of surprise: A key feature of fraud audits.

C. Fraud assessment questioning: Valid as part of the audit process.

D. Management’s intentions: Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.

Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.

References:ACFE materials on fraud auditing techniques​​.

Behaviorist Theories in Conditioning:

Positive reinforcement, such as offering bonuses, is more effective than punishment in encouraging adherence to policies and reducing deviations.

Employees are more likely to repeat behaviors that are rewarded.

Why C is Correct:

This approach aligns with behaviorist principles, fostering compliance through incentives rather than fear or criticism, which could negatively impact morale.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A and D: Punishments may lead to resentment and reduced motivation.

B: Public criticism can create a toxic work environment, discouraging open communication​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and Fraud Examination Guide​​.

ISA and GAAS requirements on unpredictability in audit procedures​​.

Behaviorist theories on employee motivation and conditioning​​.

Collusion between contractors is an example of external fraud risk because it involves external parties conspiring to defraud the organization. The other options describe internal fraud risks, such as actions committed by employees within the organization.

=================

CFEs must act ethically and responsibly when handling sensitive information. Eliece should inform Jewel that she will try to maintain confidentiality but must adhere to professional and ethical obligations, which may require disclosing the information to appropriate parties such as her employer or relevant authorities. This balanced response encourages transparency while maintaining ethical standards.

=================

Risk assessment is a core component of the COSO Framework and focuses on identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks that could affect the organization's objectives. Andrew's initiative to evaluate threats aligns with this component, as it involves understanding the potential risks and their impact on achieving the organization's goals.

=================